This year, a series of institutional adjustments by the U.S. SEC has accelerated the listing pace of cryptocurrency ETFs to an unprecedented level. The unified listing standards, significantly compressed approval timelines, and the allowance for cryptocurrency ETFs to enter the "20-day automatic approval" channel under the 8(a) clause have transformed the previously difficult and lengthy approval process into a predictable, replicable, and scalable regulatory model. Meanwhile, a large number of applications that were backlogged during the government shutdown were concentrated and cleared after the shutdown ended, directly triggering the "wave of altcoin ETF listings" we see today. From past individual case approvals to the current institutionalized batch releases, cryptocurrency assets are no longer viewed as a regulatory gray area but are formally included as a type of asset within the traditional financial framework. The change in regulatory logic is more important than the products themselves; it signifies that cryptocurrency assets have, for the first time, entered a "highly standardized regulatory highway," establishing the boundary for the industry's new phase.

Among all the altcoin ETFs that have launched, Solana undoubtedly stands out. After its launch, it experienced continuous net inflows and rapidly accumulated scale, demonstrating institutional investors' high recognition of SOL: it possesses an infrastructure-level ecological narrative, high-performance network growth expectations, and, more importantly, its market cap structure has enough elasticity, being both robust and having room for growth. In contrast, assets like LTC, HBAR, and XRP, although they have also completed ETF listings, do not attract as much capital or attention as SOL, with some products even experiencing a "cooling off" immediately after listing. This indicates that ETFs are not a universal accelerator; what the market truly chases is the logic, ecology, and potential of the assets, rather than the ETF format itself. When regulatory channels are opened and funds have a more compliant path, the real competition is just beginning. In the future, under the ETF system, assets will move towards stratification more quickly: leading projects will absorb the vast majority of incremental funds, mid-tier assets will need to rely on their own narratives to break through, while tail-end assets may be accelerated towards marginalization. Institutionalization will not ensure that all projects "share the benefits equally"; rather, it will make the strong stronger and the weak even less likely to make a comeback.

Many investors are accustomed to the old logic, believing that "listing an ETF = soaring prices," but the market performance of this round of altcoin ETFs shows a clear calmness and differentiation. In an environment where overall macro liquidity is tight and interest rate uncertainty persists, institutions are more focused on risk-reward ratios and long-term allocation value, rather than short-term price stimulation. In terms of actual performance, even with an ETF entry ticket, many altcoin prices have not seen explosive increases; instead, they have maintained sideways movement or slight pullbacks. The real reason lies in the fact that the core value of ETFs is "compliance" and "inclusion in institutional portfolios," rather than "immediate price increases." It lays a transparent, auditable, and risk-controllable infrastructure for the potential influx of institutional funds in the coming years, but it will not automatically bring a flood of capital in a short time. Only under the premise of improved macro conditions, a warming market risk appetite, and continuous progress in project ecology can the institutional value of ETFs truly translate into price value. Therefore, what we see now is not a rise following favorable developments, but a more mature market response: infrastructure is built first, and funds are waiting for the right opportunity.

From a longer perspective, the batch listing of altcoin ETFs is not just a product update, but a "systemic leap" that the cryptocurrency industry is undergoing. The core logic of the future market will shift from retail sentiment to institutional allocation, from high-volatility narratives to stable value models, and from speculative games to long-term holding systems. This means that the entire market will exhibit more pronounced structural stratification: assets that can enter the ETF system and receive institutional allocation will become "institutional layer assets"; projects with real ecology, technological value, and narrative capability will become "growth layer assets"; while long-tail projects lacking transparency and unable to be included in institutional risk control frameworks are likely to be marginalized. For the industry, this is a more transparent era; for investors, it is an opportunity to reassess asset quality; for project parties, it is a new cycle where "value must be clearly articulated, must be auditable, and must be able to accept regulation." The batch listing of altcoin ETFs may not change short-term market trends, but it alters the long-term structure of the market. What is truly being leveraged is not the price, but the capital path and growth logic of cryptocurrency assets for the next decade.

Related: Bitcoin (BTC) plummeted 5% in a flash crash, recording its worst November performance since 2018.

Original article: “Batch Approval of Altcoin ETFs, Cryptocurrency Assets Officially Enter the ‘SEC Regulatory Highway’”

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。