In the past few months, the market turbulence has refocused attention on a long-standing core issue: the risks of crypto assets are not confined to the virtual ecosystem but are increasingly linked to the traditional financial system. Recent reports from international regulatory bodies and actual market performance reflect a trend—despite the continuous expansion of the crypto industry, the regulatory framework remains notably fragmented. Differences in exchange rules, asset issuance requirements, stablecoin regulation, and anti-money laundering standards across various jurisdictions make it difficult to unify supervision of cross-border activities, thereby weakening the effectiveness of risk identification and management.

Stablecoins continue to be a focal point for global regulation. Due to their widespread use in trading, settlement, and cross-chain liquidity, the operational stability of stablecoins directly impacts market liquidity and trust mechanisms. Regulatory authorities have repeatedly emphasized that large-scale redemptions or opaque reserve quality could not only lead to price deviations but also spread to the broader financial system through payment channels and short-term financing markets. Although many regions are pushing for stricter transparency and reserve disclosure requirements, the implementation of standards is inconsistent, and gaps remain in governance structures and cross-border cooperation.

On the market side, the recent rapid correction in crypto asset prices reflects an increased sensitivity to global macro changes. Interest rate policies, changes in risk appetite, and volatility in traditional markets can quickly transmit to the crypto market. The chain reaction following price declines—including leveraged liquidations, decreased exchange liquidity, and widening bid-ask spreads for certain assets—further amplifies market volatility. More importantly, the increased participation of institutional investors means that these fluctuations could inversely affect their risk management in other asset classes, creating cross-market spillover effects.

Policy uncertainty is also a significant factor affecting the market. Changes in regulatory enforcement, licensing approvals, and legal precedents in various countries can directly impact the operating environment for trading platforms and issuers. Some market participants may choose to exit or relocate their businesses due to stricter policies or rising compliance costs, which could disrupt market structure and exacerbate liquidity tensions in the short term. A lack of predictability in regulation can also elevate the overall risk pricing level in the industry, making the market highly sensitive to policy news.

Additionally, technological and operational risks remain structural pain points in the industry. Smart contract vulnerabilities, attacks on cross-chain bridges, or management errors in centralized institutions have previously caused significant losses. In tense market environments, technological vulnerabilities are more likely to trigger chain reactions. Although the industry continues to strengthen auditing, risk control, and monitoring tools, the increasing complexity of systems keeps the dynamic between defense and attack in a state of flux.

In response to these risks, the industry and regulatory bodies are promoting some directional improvements. First is cross-border regulatory coordination, especially in the supervision of stablecoin issuers, global exchanges, and large custodial institutions, striving to establish a common framework that covers major business activities. Second is enhancing transparency by promoting stricter and more uniform reserve disclosure requirements, including verifiable reserve proofs and emergency redemption mechanisms. Third is the improvement of internal risk management within the industry, as institutional investors gradually incorporate crypto assets into more standardized stress tests and liquidity plans to avoid individual events triggering widespread contagion.

Overall, the recent turbulence in the crypto market is not just a price fluctuation but a reality check on the existing regulatory framework, market structure, and industry governance. From regulatory fragmentation to stablecoin risks, from cross-border enforcement differences to technological vulnerabilities, these issues collectively form the soil for systemic risks. In the future, for the crypto market to achieve more robust development, substantial progress must be made in transparency, standardization, and cross-border coordination. Only in this way can the industry maintain innovation while reducing structural instability and preventing localized shocks from evolving into broader financial risk events.

Related: Veteran trader Peter Brandt: Bitcoin (BTC) will reach $200,000 by the third quarter of 2029

Original text: “Crypto Market Risk Assessment: Fragmented Regulation, Stablecoin Concerns, and Real Systemic Spillovers”

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。