Author: FinTax
1. Introduction
On October 31, 2025, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) released the "Discussion Paper on Asset Tokenization in Malaysia's Financial Sector" (hereinafter referred to as the "Discussion Paper"), officially launching the action plan for asset tokenization in the financial sector and announcing the roadmap and implementation path. In the current context of the RWA (Real World Assets) boom and chaos, the Discussion Paper and subsequent actions such as soliciting opinions demonstrate Malaysia's prudent and innovative approach to addressing RWA: it aims to proactively position itself in the RWA space, leveraging blockchain technology to enhance asset circulation efficiency while strengthening regulation to ensure that domestic RWA develops in a compliant manner.
The Discussion Paper not only outlines the implementation phase of the plan but also proposes an organizational model to advance the tokenization process and application scenarios with clear economic value. It emphasizes promoting this process by strengthening the foundations of monetary and financial stability and financial integrity, potentially providing a reference path that integrates innovation and compliance for the current RWA landscape. This article will interpret the regulatory layout and trends of RWA in Malaysia, the driving forces behind its development, and analyze the impact of this initiative on the RWA industry and practitioners.
2. Core Content Interpretation of the Asset Tokenization Action Plan
According to the roadmap published in the Discussion Paper, Malaysia's asset tokenization action will be divided into three phases: the official launch of the plan in 2025, the release of documents, and seeking industry feedback; the concept verification and pilot phase in 2026; and the expansion of the pilot scale in 2027, summarizing test results and assessing their impact on legal, regulatory, and technical aspects to formulate a path for large-scale application. To successfully complete the plan, Malaysia will primarily utilize its established Digital Asset Innovation Hub (DAIH) platform, adopting a collaborative co-creation model involving regulatory agencies, industry participants, and stakeholders in the tokenization application process, focusing on areas such as supply chain financing for SMEs, cross-border trade, and Islamic finance. The aim is to address long-standing pain points in Malaysia's financial ecosystem and to systematically and progressively promote the exploration and practice of tokenization in the financial sector over the next three years.
2.1 Regulatory Framework under the Collaborative Co-Creation Model
In exploring cryptocurrency regulation, Malaysia has gradually formed a dual-track parallel regulatory system centered around the Securities Commission (SC) and Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM). The SC is responsible for the regulatory oversight of the securities attributes of cryptocurrencies, while BNM focuses more on monetary policy and financial stability. To maintain a compliant environment while advancing the tokenization process, the SC and BNM will leverage the DAIH and the Asset Tokenization Industry Working Group (IWG) to utilize the regulatory sandbox. The core function of DAIH is to facilitate two-way learning between regulatory agencies and the market by providing a regulated sandbox environment where high-risk innovations can be safely validated and piloted in a transparent and controllable setting. It allows businesses to test cutting-edge ideas under specific exemptions while enabling BNM to closely observe the real risks and regulatory blind spots in the implementation of technology. Under DAIH, BNM and SC will jointly lead the establishment of the Asset Tokenization Industry Working Group (IWG), which will not only coordinate resources to promote pilots, consolidate industry strength, and develop industry standards but also fulfill regulatory responsibilities by assessing the potential risks of tokenization to the financial and monetary stability of Malaysia's financial sector, as well as identifying regulatory gaps and legal obstacles to support the future development of regulatory policies.
2.2 AML/CFT/CPF Regulatory Requirements without Exemptions or Exceptions
In the Discussion Paper, BNM's regulatory stance on Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Counter Financing of Terrorism (CFT), Counter Proliferation Financing (CPF), and Targeted Financial Sanctions (TFS) is very clear and strict, with compliance seen as an insurmountable bottom line in the exploration of tokenization. BNM specifies a mandatory licensing framework in the section on application scenario considerations, stating that only authorized users who have undergone identity identification and verification (KYC) can access and participate in tokenized financial services. Furthermore, BNM requires clear identification and accountability for participants—whether financial institutions or technology providers, they must be legally traceable and accountable entities. When financial institutions outsource some services to technology providers, they must still ensure that their partners comply with AML/CFT regulations and bear ultimate compliance responsibility. BNM also specifically highlights the AML/CFT risks posed by stablecoins, stipulating that any exploration of tokenized currencies must comply with existing AML/CFT/CPF and TFS measures. BNM points out in the document that tokenized assets with payment functions (including stablecoins) may amplify AML/CFT risks, and all related explorations must strictly adhere to current AML/CFT/CPF and TFS measures to maintain financial stability. This means that issuers must demonstrate monitoring and compliance capabilities far beyond the norm; otherwise, approval is unlikely.
2.3 Tokenization of Islamic Finance
In exploring potential application scenarios, the combination of Islamic finance principles with asset tokenization represents a strategically significant and uniquely advantageous area for Malaysia's tokenization plan. Islamic finance principles are a set of financial and business practice guidelines based on Shariah law, which differs from traditional Western financial systems primarily in that it not only focuses on capital returns but also emphasizes social justice and moral attributes in economic activities. Introducing tokenization into the Islamic finance sector, utilizing the technological characteristics of blockchain, could address long-standing structural challenges in traditional Islamic finance.
The technological limitations of traditional financial systems have forced Islamic finance to make many compromises in product design, increasing complexity and costs. For example, "Murabahah" (cost-plus financing) and certain types of "Salam" (forward delivery sales) require that asset ownership and payment actions occur simultaneously or nearly instantaneously to avoid the suspicion of interest (Riba) arising from time delays. Tokenization can enable the synchronous and immediate exchange of assets and payments. For instance, when exchanging a token representing a physical commodity with a token representing funds, the transaction either succeeds simultaneously or fails simultaneously, technically eliminating the possibility of one party delaying delivery, aligning with Shariah's requirement for immediacy. The "composability" of smart contracts can also encode the logic of multiple contracts into a series of interconnected smart contracts, reducing operational and compliance risks associated with complex Islamic financial products that must strictly adhere to Shariah conditions.
3. Strategic Considerations for RWA Layout
The announcement by Bank Negara Malaysia is not a spur-of-the-moment decision but a key step in the evolution of the country's digital financial strategy. In earlier years, the Securities Commission (SC) of Malaysia issued policy documents such as the "Capital Markets and Services Act" and the "Capital Markets and Services (Securities Regulation) (Digital Currency and Digital Token) Regulations" and "Digital Asset Guidelines," providing clear regulatory boundaries for the entire ecosystem. The "Blueprint for the Financial Sector 2022-2026" released by BNM in 2022 outlines the vision and strategies for the development of the financial industry over the next five years, which includes promoting market vitality, driving sustainable development, and continuing to focus on monetary and financial stability. The release of the RWA plan is a response to this blueprint. In the current context of transitioning RWA from conceptual exploration to substantial institutional construction and market practice, Malaysia's strategic positioning in RWA is driven by both internal and external considerations.
3.1 Enhancing Financial System Efficiency and National Competitiveness
Malaysia's strategic layout stems from its profound insights into the internal and external economic and financial environment. Although Malaysia is the third-largest economy in Southeast Asia, its financial market still has room for improvement in settlement efficiency, cross-border payments, and financing convenience for SMEs. In the face of Singapore's first-mover advantage in the digital asset space and Hong Kong's active pursuit, Malaysia is committed to establishing a more efficient and modern financial system to find its own track. Tokenization can achieve near-real-time settlement, significantly reducing intermediary costs and operational risks. By emphasizing compliance, institutional participation, and the empowerment of real assets, Malaysia aims to shape an image of a "robust innovator," attracting traditional financial institutions and long-term capital that are cautious about pure cryptocurrency speculation but optimistic about the underlying technological value of blockchain. This aims to clarify its positioning in the Asian digital financial landscape and enhance financial competitiveness.
3.2 Activating a Large Stock of Illiquid Assets
Malaysia's economic development contains a significant amount of illiquid assets, such as SME loans, real estate, infrastructure projects, and agricultural commodities (like palm oil). Through tokenization, these assets can be divided into smaller investment units, significantly lowering investment thresholds and creating an active secondary market, thereby revitalizing existing assets and injecting new, lower-cost capital vitality into the real economy.
3.3 Consolidating Its Leadership in the Global Islamic Finance Sector
This is Malaysia's most strategically significant differentiating advantage. The global Islamic finance asset scale is enormous, but its product structure is often complex. RWA aligns closely with the principles of Islamic finance, emphasizing asset backing and risk-sharing. Through tokenization, Malaysia can automate the profit distribution and asset backing processes of Islamic bonds (Sukuk) using smart contracts, greatly enhancing transparency and trust among global investors. Additionally, it can create an unprecedented, highly liquid secondary market for over a billion Islamic investors worldwide, addressing the core pain point of liquidity shortages in traditional Islamic financial products. This could also give rise to new, more segmented Islamic financial products that were previously difficult to realize due to operational complexities.
4. Analysis and Reflection on Malaysia's RWA Regulatory Trends
Historically, Malaysia has not regarded cryptocurrencies as legal tender, and in the Discussion Paper, BNM strictly distinguishes RWA from cryptocurrencies. The Discussion Paper repeatedly emphasizes that its exploration is limited to tokenized financial services backed by real-world assets, clearly delineating it from speculative cryptocurrencies (like Bitcoin) that lack underlying value. This positioning ensures that innovation does not conflict with the fundamental goal of financial stability. Regarding its regulatory attitude and objectives towards RWA, BNM emphasizes a risk-based approach, prioritizing compliance, and adhering to the principle of "same activity, same risk, same regulatory outcome": regardless of the technology used, as long as the activity constitutes a regulated financial behavior (such as payment or securities issuance), the relevant institutions must hold the appropriate licenses and comply with existing regulations. It also clearly emphasizes the substantial economic value of tokenization, opposing technology for technology's sake or regulatory arbitrage, stating that tokenization explorations must aim to address real market pain points.
Under this regulatory trend, compliance will become the ticket for RWA practitioners to enter the Malaysian market in the future. Practitioners involved in key businesses such as stablecoins, asset custody, and trading venues must prioritize obtaining the relevant licenses from BNM. Professional consultants well-versed in Malaysian financial regulations and tax laws must be involved from the project design phase. Conducting tax impact assessments for every step of the asset tokenization process should become standard operating procedure. The purely "decentralized" narrative is unlikely to prevail under the Malaysian model; the collaborative co-creation model will also become inevitable. The most viable path for Web3 technology providers will be to form alliances with licensed financial institutions (banks, brokerages), where the former provides technology and the latter provides compliance licenses and customer trust. This "technology + license" cooperation model may become the market mainstream.
5. Conclusion
The "regulatory - technology - entity" framework established in Malaysia's RWA roadmap paves a compliant path from concept validation to large-scale application, providing a model for promoting the deep integration of blockchain technology with the real economy under strict regulatory protection. It showcases a future of a regional RWA tokenization center characterized by safety, efficiency, and compliance. The strict anti-money laundering framework and licensing access model it establishes will also provide important references for the entire Southeast Asian region on how to balance financial innovation with risk prevention. For Web3 practitioners, the key to future success may not lie in the cutting edge of technology but in a profound understanding of regulatory intentions, actively seeking cooperation, and deeply integrating compliance into product design and business strategies.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
