The push for cryptocurrency integration in public finance gained momentum in the U.S. state of Ohio as officials advanced efforts to allow digital asset payments for government services. While the vendor approval signals progress, it does not yet guarantee implementation, and more details on how such a system would function have yet to emerge. The development nevertheless reflects a growing trend among U.S. states to explore blockchain applications in public transactions.

Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose issued a statement on Sept. 24 after the Ohio Board of Deposit selected a vendor to facilitate cryptocurrency transactions, including bitcoin, for state fees and services. He also addressed the issue on social media platform X:

Today, the State Board of Deposit unanimously approved a vendor to facilitate the acceptance of cryptocurrency payments for state fees and services.

“With hundreds of thousands of transactions going through my office each year, I want to commend the board for taking bold action to position us at the forefront of the emerging digital economy,” he added.

“Ohio has always been a state of pioneers and innovators. I want to commend Treasurer Sprague, Auditor Faber, and Attorney General Yost for taking this bold step to position us at the forefront of the emerging digital economy,” LaRose’s statement reads. “There’s a reason why we now rank among the top five states in the nation to do business. It’s because we’re not afraid to embrace the tools, trends and technologies that incentivize job creators to come here.”

The approval follows an April request from LaRose and Treasurer Robert Sprague to authorize crypto payments and a unanimous May vote to permit them, contingent on vendor selection. The Ohio Secretary of State further shared:

My office processes hundreds of thousands of financial transactions each year, and we’ve heard a growing demand for a cryptocurrency payment option. I’m excited and ready to be the first to provide it to our customers.

Although the Secretary of State’s office has expressed interest in becoming the first agency to use the option, further clarification is needed on timelines, technical integration, and regulatory oversight. Advocates point to efficiency and competitiveness as advantages, while critics emphasize risks tied to volatility and compliance.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。