In the first half of 2025, cryptocurrency exchanges have become the norm in the market. Is this market speculation, or is there data to back it up? What is cryptocurrency exchange, and how does it differ from cross-chain or traditional exchanges?
In the second quarter of 2025, the spot trading volume on decentralized exchanges (DEX) surged by 25.3%, reaching $876 billion. During the same period, the trading volume on centralized exchanges (CEX) fell by nearly 28%, ending the quarter at $3.9 trillion.
An increasing number of users are starting to exchange cryptocurrencies directly, rather than using the traditional method of "selling for fiat, then buying back."
Cryptocurrency exchange refers to the direct conversion of one digital asset to another between wallets, without the need for fiat currency, order books, or third-party custody. For example, you do not need to first sell Bitcoin (BTC) for US dollars and then buy Ethereum (ETH); instead, you can directly exchange BTC for ETH in one step.
When people talk about cryptocurrency conversion, they often refer to selling for fiat or using the platform's internal "conversion" tools, which may hide fees, involve delays, or have intermediary steps.
Exchanges can bypass these issues, especially when combined with cross-chain exchanges or cryptocurrency cross-chain bridge solutions, which highlight their advantages when transferring assets across different blockchains.
Many users prefer decentralized exchanges over trading through exchanges for the following reasons:
Lower fees: Exchanges typically avoid high trading fees and premiums, with users only needing to pay small network or smart contract gas fees.
Better liquidity: Users can avoid insufficient order book liquidity and price slippage. Exchanges based on automated market makers (AMM) can directly connect to liquidity pools, facilitating smoother transactions.
Non-custodial self-management: Users control their private keys, do not need KYC, and do not have to trust centralized exchanges to hold their funds.
Faster transaction speeds: Most on-chain exchanges are nearly instantaneous, without the need for multiple conversion steps or waiting for fiat settlements.
Despite the efficiency and low cost of the exchange process, the following risks should still be noted:
Smart contract vulnerabilities: If there are code flaws in the DEX or cross-chain bridge, funds may be at risk.
Large transaction slippage: Large exchanges can still impact the market, especially for pairs with lower liquidity.
Limited advanced features: Exchanges are not suitable for complex trading strategies.
Therefore, leading cross-chain bridges and exchange platforms in 2025 prioritize security audits, deep liquidity pools, and measures to prevent front-running.
Overall, the combination of speed, low cost, and self-management of funds makes cryptocurrency exchange (especially cross-chain exchange) more attractive to most users than traditional trading.
The methods of exchange have changed significantly. Today, high-quality platforms can perform cross-chain, cross-bridge, and cross-Rollup smart scanning, providing users with better rates and reducing risks.
Take Symbiosis.finance as an example; it integrates liquidity from layer one networks, layer two bridges, as well as EVM and non-EVM networks, further optimizing exchange rates and reducing risks.
Users can complete cross-chain exchanges directly without additional operations on cross-chain bridges.
The most notable upgrade of Symbiosis is its self-built blockchain (SIS chain), used for internal management and exchange bridging logic. This brings two major advantages: first, stable and predictable fees, eliminating concerns about fluctuating bridge fees; second, faster and more reliable execution of cross-chain transactions.
The security mechanism remains decentralized. The network uses a delegated proof-of-stake (PoS) model, allowing token holders to act as validators or delegate others to participate, distributing responsibility, reducing centralization risks, and incentivizing honest participation. This architecture does not require traditional fund pool-type bridging, which has frequently become a target for attacks in recent years.
Symbiosis directly integrates the inter-chain bridging protocol into its own blockchain, further reducing potential failure points while ensuring a streamlined user experience.
In short, the best cross-chain bridges in 2025 have simplified the exchange process to a "one-click operation," efficiently addressing complex cross-chain interoperability and security challenges in the background.
Did you know? Symbiosis operates a peer-to-peer relay network that runs off-chain outside of smart contracts. This network uses multi-party computation (MPC) and threshold signature schemes (TSS) to verify cross-chain operations, with relayers staking SIS tokens to earn rewards.
While platforms like Symbiosis have set benchmarks for cryptocurrency exchange and cross-chain bridging in 2025, different service providers still adopt diverse technological paths, all aiming to enable users to transfer assets quickly, securely, and at low cost across different blockchains.
Uniswap v4 focuses on on-chain exchanges rather than cross-chain interoperability. Its architecture aims to achieve deep liquidity and extremely low gas fees within Ethereum (ETH) and its supported layer two networks, but it does not natively support inter-chain cryptocurrency bridging.
The core upgrade lies in the hooks framework, allowing developers to insert custom logic at specific points in the exchange lifecycle, including:
Real-time fee adjustments based on market conditions
New order types, such as time-weighted average price (TWAP) or limit orders
Integration of on-chain oracles for accurate pricing and slippage control
The underlying structure uses a monolithic contract and introduces a flash settlement mechanism, reducing gas consumption by up to 99% compared to earlier versions. This is ideal for users in a single ecosystem seeking low-fee exchanges and customized trading logic.
Did you know? Uniswap v4 introduces Hook fees (custom code that runs before the exchange), allowing developers to set exclusive charging rules, such as withdrawal penalties or performance-based rewards.
4-Swap has chosen a completely different technical route. It does not rely on AMM liquidity pools or Rollups but utilizes hash time-locked contracts (HTLC) to achieve direct on-chain exchanges between two parties on different blockchains—without the need for liquidity pools or bridging contracts.
Its "worry-free mechanism" addresses issues in early atomic exchanges where one party delays the process, wasting the other's time or gas, preventing the delaying party from profiting.
The biggest advantage of 4-Swap is extreme trustlessness and privacy protection, but there are trade-offs: exchanges require finding matching counterparties, and prices are negotiated by both parties rather than set by AMM.
4-Swap is more suitable for niche markets or users with strong technical capabilities who can accept slower execution speeds.
Did you know? 4-Swap is the first atomic exchange protocol to merge penalties with principal, requiring only one transaction per chain, significantly reducing on-chain operation steps (only four steps), improving execution speed without needing additional Bitcoin (BTC) operation codes.
These cases showcase the diversity of cross-chain exchange technological routes, from high-speed AMM aggregators to manual atomic exchange protocols, with continuous innovation.
Related: Hedge fund Numerai secures a $500 million funding commitment from JPMorgan, driving the integration of cryptocurrency and AI.
Original article: “Swap Protocol vs Cross-Chain Bridge vs Asset Conversion: What Changes Will 2025 Bring?”
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
