😂 Borrowing from the artist's content, although stablecoins are a component of RWA, they are actually the part that investors find most difficult to participate in, especially since making a profit can be very challenging. After all, we have previously discussed that the essence of stablecoins is a certificate for short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, and the yields on U.S. Treasuries are hard for us to access. Even if they are provided, during monetary tightening, the yields might still be quite high, but when it comes to monetary easing, it is likely that even a 1% annualized yield would be difficult to achieve.
The same logic applies to gold; gold is a safe-haven asset, and as an investment during periods of risk, it is certainly good. However, because it is a safe-haven asset, the usage rate of gold stablecoins remains relatively low. Just like how $BTC is used for payments, very few people actually use Bitcoin as a payment method.
A few days ago, I was discussing this topic with some friends. My viewpoint is that if I absolutely need to use BTC for payment, I would first buy BTC with U and then make the payment, and I would never use my existing BTC for payment.
Currently, I see three areas where RWA can be implemented:
The method of on-chain brokers combined with Restaking strategies.
Bond issuance by asset issuers targeting (profitable) enterprises.
RWA arbitrage of (profitable) asset packages.
These three areas have good potential under compliance conditions and provide ordinary traders with opportunities to make profits.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
