Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

Santander Bank Not Liable for Customer’s $750K Crypto Loss, Court Confirms

CN
bitcoin.com
Follow
1 year ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

The Massachusetts Appeals Court, in an unpublished decision, affirmed on April 18 the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Lourenco Garcia against Santander Bank, N.A., rejecting his attempt to recover over $750,000 lost in a cryptocurrency scam.

The court upheld a November 2023 Superior Court ruling that found Garcia’s amended complaint did not state a viable legal claim under Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Garcia had sought to hold Santander liable for allegedly failing to intervene when he authorized a series of large transactions later linked to a fraudulent crypto platform called Coinegg.

According to Garcia’s allegations, between Dec. 13, 2021, and Jan. 4, 2022, he made two online card purchases through Crypto.com and initiated seven wire transfers at Santander branches, all totaling $751,500. These funds were routed through an account at Metropolitan Commercial Bank of New York and used to purchase cryptocurrency, which was eventually sent to Coinegg. Garcia stated that the Coinegg platform turned out to be a scam, leaving him unable to recover the funds. In support of his case, Garcia cited provisions in Santander’s Personal Deposit Account Agreement and its website, including one that read:

If we see any transactions that follow patterns fraudsters typically use, we will text you or email you to ask whether or not you authorized the transactions.

The Appeals Court panel concluded that these statements did not impose a duty on Santander to halt or question the transactions. The court stated:

The Agreement states that Santander ‘may decline or prevent any or all transactions,’ but does not obligate Santander to do so.

The judges emphasized that Garcia had authorized every transaction himself and had not identified any contract terms or legal duty breached by the bank. Additionally, the court found that the website language did not amount to an enforceable promise and that Garcia failed to allege false or deceptive conduct required to support claims of negligent misrepresentation or violations of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by bitcoin.com

11 minutes ago
Pharos Hits $1B Valuation on Mainnet Launch
1 hour ago
DOJ: 1,000 Victims Hit in $215M Scam—$1.2M in Crypto, Cash Found
3 hours ago
US Warns Hormuz Digital Asset Payments May Trigger Sanctions Risk
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
11 minutes ago
Pharos Hits $1B Valuation on Mainnet Launch
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
1 hour ago
DOJ: 1,000 Victims Hit in $215M Scam—$1.2M in Crypto, Cash Found
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
3 hours ago
US Warns Hormuz Digital Asset Payments May Trigger Sanctions Risk
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
4 hours ago
SBI Group, Visa Launch Crypto Card With up to 10% BTC, ETH, XRP Promo Rewards
avatar
avatarbitcoin.com
6 hours ago
Trump Says Iran Conflict Over, Nasdaq Sets Record High, Bitcoin Climbs 2.5%
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink