Clynton Marks, one of the alleged masterminds of the South African bitcoin Ponzi scheme Mirror Trading International (MTI), has been detained. Marks’ detention was prompted by his failure to provide adequate answers to liquidators’ questions about bitcoins withdrawn from his MTI account.

According to a Mybroadband report, while liquidators were able to account for a portion of the funds, they could not determine how the rest were used. This prompted liquidators to seek the court’s help in establishing what happened to the funds. Under Section 417 of South Africa’s Insolvency Act, the Master of the High Court or the court itself can conduct an inquiry into the trade or dealings of a company that is being wound up and is unable to pay its debts.

Those summoned, who can be directors or people believed to possess company property, can be examined under oath or affirmation. Marks’ reported arrest on March 7 suggests his answers were deemed unsatisfactory by liquidators. However, the MTI co-mastermind insists he is providing all the information he can.

“I’m doing my best to answer all the questions. Unfortunately, my memory doesn’t serve me well trying to remember all these different transactions, and it looks like I’m not allowed to communicate with the people who operated my accounts for me,” Marks is quoted as saying.

As stated in the report, Marks delegated the task of investing and handling withdrawals to two associates, Don Nkomo and Andrew Caw.

Although the late Johann Steynberg was widely believed to be the sole mastermind of MTI, Marks and his then-wife, Cheri, were seen as his co-conspirators. As reported by Bitcoin.com News in 2021, Marks, identified as a co-owner of MTI, previously opposed attempts to liquidate the Ponzi scheme. However, the liquidation order was eventually granted, and in 2022, Marks, Steynberg and others were ordered to pay back $291 million.

However, despite Marks’ protests, South African Magistrate Petro Engelbrecht still authorized his arrest. An unnamed source in the report suggests the arrest order was issued to punish Marks for testing the magistrate’s patience.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。