Can the TG bot become a separate track in Web3? In my opinion, it cannot. If it is to become a separate track, three specific conditions need to be met: ① the track solves real problems existing in blockchain; ② the track contributes to the mass adoption of Web3 in blockchain; ③ the track has a sufficiently differentiated narrative.

1⃣ In terms of condition ①, the TG bot does not solve real issues such as scalability and privacy and security in blockchain.

2⃣ In terms of condition ②, the emergence of the TG bot in a specific area contributes to the prosperity of the Ton ecosystem, but it has limited help in increasing Web3 mass adoption. Who would initially use TG bot as a new user? 🤔

3⃣ In terms of condition ③, the TG bot also does not have a sufficiently differentiated narrative.

In summary, I believe the existence of the TG bot is due to the need for the prosperity of the Ton ecosystem, so the development prospects of the TG bot are highly dependent on the development of Ton. Of course, there may be arguments that the TG bot can expand to channels similar to Whatsapp and Discord, but the question is: is a field that heavily relies on channels worth investing in? 🧐

Even though the TG bot market has a low barrier to entry and is easy to imitate and replicate, there is a serious homogenization phenomenon among projects. However, there are still many projects in the TG bot niche area because there are quite a few users in the existing Web3 user base who need TG bot for trading, airdrop hunting, sniper new coins, copy trading, wallet address monitoring, and coin price alerts. Therefore, there will definitely be many projects in the TG bot niche area. But from the perspective of VC investment, the TG bot may not necessarily be one of the many good choices. @GryphsisAcademy @ChainFeedsxyz @HelloBTC365 @thecryptoskanda

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。