You are fundamentally interpreting Mr. Mi's framework based on "who is right and who is wrong".

Realists are based on strength, so the United States was super-sovereign during its unipolar period, surpassing other countries.

The unipolar world of the United States lasted for about 17 years, during which it could be considered bipolar (China and the United States).

Mr. Mi also did not think that NATO's advance into Ukraine and provoking Russia had any moral flaws, but rather said it was unwise because the United States did not focus on dealing with its enemy, China. Conversely, if China did not exist, perhaps it would be a good thing to completely suppress Russia by fighting with it.

Mr. Mi did not raise any questions about the containment strategy of the first island chain by the United States.

Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian issue, first, it fundamentally does not serve U.S. interests, and second, Mr. Mi does not agree with the massacre.

So in the end, Mr. Mi is an Americanist, but he openly and clearly states all these principles, which is admirable.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。