On May 15, 2026, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) released a heavyweight proposed rule (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) under the GENIUS Act framework: to establish a complete set of operational and risk management standards for Payment Type Stablecoin Issuers (PPSIs) licensed by it. This draft has made its way to the Federal Register, indicating that it is no longer just a concept within regulatory circles, but has officially entered the administrative legislative process, while also initiating a public comment period. The public is given a window until July 17, 2026, to express their positions and vie for discourse. On the surface, this is a technical specification focused on the payment functionality of "stable crypto tokens," but in essence, it is a regulatory offense and defense concerning licensing and position in the market: on the unified track laid out by the GENIUS Act, banking regulators have begun designing their supporting rules for the banking system. The NCUA's involvement at this time is to ensure that credit unions are not "under-equipped" in the setting of standards and starting lines. As emphasized by NCUA Chairman Kyle Hauptman, the goal of this proposed rule is to make sure that credit unions are consistent with the compliance thresholds of bank subsidiaries, rather than passively following, thereby drawing the battle over who can compliantly issue payment tokens and who can define the new generation of payment infrastructure back to a regulatory board that appears fair but has underlying variables.

GENIUS Act Paves the Way: Congress Draws New Payment Tracks

Before the NCUA made its move, the outline of the board had already been drawn by Congress. The GENIUS Act singled out "payment function-oriented stable crypto tokens" and provided a unified legal basis for them: as long as tokens are used in payment scenarios rather than primarily for speculative investment, and are issued and operated by regulated financial institutions, they can be regulated by a clear set of rules on this "unified track." This effectively separates payment-type tokens from a broader, more mixed pool of crypto assets, first drawing out a new path that can be included in regulatory oversight, before discussing who is qualified to participate.

This track is not exclusively tailored for banks. The GENIUS Act has included traditional financial institutions such as banks and credit unions from the beginning, reserving compliance pathways for their involvement in payment-type token businesses. Subsequent regulatory division of labor has seen respective industry regulators drafting specific rules under the same legislative framework: on the bank side, the OCC and other agencies are promoting supporting regulatory drafts, while on the credit union side, the NCUA is translating the abstract principles of the GENIUS Act into operational requirements through this proposed rule. The two are not acting independently but are working together to implement the new payment order designed by Congress, creating parallel channels for banks and credit unions under a unified overarching framework. The real distinction will be reflected in which side can more quickly and stably establish this compliance track as their home ground.

Credit Unions Don't Want to Play Second Fiddle: Competing for Compliance Tickets with Banks

Under the GENIUS framework, the stage has been set for both banks and credit unions, but who takes center stage will depend on how the rules are written. NCUA Chairman Kyle Hauptman stated upfront when announcing the proposed regulations that the standard is meant to ensure that credit unions "will not be disadvantaged in terms of standards" and must "align with the proposed standards for bank subsidiaries." He effectively laid bare the issue: if the banking side obtains a wider and clearer compliance pathway, while credit unions are forced to cautiously navigate ambiguous areas, no matter how good the legislative intent is, it will diverge at the execution level.

For credit unions, this is not only a fight for "equal treatment" but also a breakthrough under structural constraints. They are typical member-owned institutions, where the investors and service recipients highly overlap, unlike shareholder commercial banks that can design risk-sharing and expansion rhythms around equity and capital markets, nor do they face the same shareholder pressure to pursue high-risk, high-return businesses. This difference in capital structure and operational model means that even if the GENIUS Act allows them to enter the payment function-oriented crypto token business, the path will not simply replicate the bank version template. What the NCUA is trying to do now is to align the rules for credit unions as closely as possible with the standards for bank subsidiaries under the same legislation: on one hand, exchanging a "same license, similar threshold" for a voice in the future compliance payment token market, avoiding the label of a second-class issuer; on the other hand, it effectively takes on a more stringent risk management responsibility voluntarily – including higher expectations for capital resilience, asset safety, and operational stability. For those already known for their stability and limited scale, this alignment is both a ticket to enter the new track and a hard-landing upgrade that must be accomplished in internal governance and risk culture.

Proposed Rules Open the Door: Who Can Obtain the PPSI License

Under the larger framework set up by the GENIUS Act, whether one can legally issue payment function-oriented "stable" crypto tokens primarily depends on if one is a regulated financial institution. For the credit union camp, the proposed rules issued by the NCUA on May 15, 2026, provide a clear threshold: only issuers licensed by the NCUA and defined as Payment Payment Stablecoin Issuers (PPSIs) are eligible to operate in this new track. In other words, PPSI is not a self-designated label in the market but is a regulatory identity granted by the NCUA under the authority of the GENIUS Act, determining which credit unions can participate in issuing payment-oriented stable tokens under rules similar to those for bank subsidiaries, forming a complementary pattern with the banking rules under the OCC system.

However, this threshold is currently still in draft form. What has been published is a proposed rule (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) included in the Federal Register, not a final, hard rule, and the simultaneous public comment period will last until July 17, 2026. Before that, any description of the rule’s details is just the starting point of the negotiation, not the result. From the existing brief, we only know that the regulatory intention is to establish a set of operational and risk management standards for PPSIs, aligned with the unified framework of the GENIUS Act, but we do not see more granular terms—such as how to design capital requirements, what safety and isolation standards to follow for reserve or custody assets, how transparent information disclosure needs to be, and these critical parameters have not appeared in the public text, nor can they be extrapolated as established facts. Similarly, the precise applicability scope, daily regulatory rhythm, and inspection metrics of the PPSI identity are still in a "to be determined" state; these blanks will determine how many credit unions can truly cross the threshold and obtain the PPSI license during the comment period and subsequent rule revisions.

Regulatory Puzzle Taking Shape: How OCC and NCUA Collaborate

From a regulatory perspective, the GENIUS Act resembles a unified base, upon which "puzzles" from different agencies are laid out. On the bank side, research briefs indicate that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and other banking regulators are trying to design supporting rules for banks and their subsidiaries to participate in payment-type token businesses under the same framework; on the member side, the NCUA, responsible for federal credit unions, has taken over the legislative text and proposed its regulatory draft around the new role of PPSI. Two strands are being advanced in parallel: the OCC represents national banks and some federal savings associations, emphasizing the safety and soundness of the traditional banking system; the NCUA, with a dual mission of "capital robustness + member interest protection," is attempting to ensure that credit unions are not excluded from the new track under the GENIUS framework. As a result, NCUA Chairman Kyle Hauptman has repeatedly emphasized that standards for credit unions must be ensured not to be "under-equipped," and must align with the proposed standards for bank subsidiaries; this statement presupposes the objective of aligning standards and collaborating among multiple regulatory agencies under the same legislation.

If we extend the timeline, once the rules for both the banking side and the credit union side complete the public comment process and reach their final versions, a scenario with greater conflict will emerge: under a unified legal basis, payment tokens that receive federal licensing endorsement could be issued by either large banking groups or regional credit union systems. Users’ trust anchors will shift from a single "bank brand" to a set of comparable variables—whoever has clearer regulatory labels, more readable information disclosures, and more reassuring asset isolation and risk management will be more likely to be chosen in payment scenarios. But under the same GENIUS Act, the standards cannot be copied and pasted completely: credit unions are member-owned and non-shareholder based, their business models differ from those of commercial banks, and regulators will inevitably make differentiated technical arrangements in dimensions such as capital buffers, business constraints, and frequency of daily inspections. The real competition in the future will not only concern who issues tokens first or who obtains more users, but whether the market and regulators can find an acceptable middle ground between "comparability brought by unified standards" and the "institutional characteristics reflected in differentiated management."

Countdown to the Comment Period: Where Will the Compliance Competition in Crypto Payments Lead?

From now until July 17, 2026, around this proposed rule, the real struggle is just beginning: on one side, how to accurately portray the risk tolerance of credit unions—being member-owned and smaller in scale, do they need more "conservative" capital buffers and business boundaries compared to banks; on the other side, there is the goal pointed out by the NCUA chairman: under the unified GENIUS framework, the standards for credit unions cannot appear "under-equipped"; otherwise, it undermines regulatory credibility and weakens their competitive edge in the payment crypto token business. After the comment period ends, following the typical administrative legislative path in the U.S., the NCUA will need to make trade-offs among various opinions, deciding whether to align with bank standards or to leave "credit union provisions" in certain key areas. If the final rules are adopted, the regulatory landscape for payment tokens will likely present an outline where banks and credit unions carry similar payment token functionalities on the same GENIUS legal base but with different institutional licenses. Existing crypto issuers will be forced to re-select their position between tightening compliance thresholds and opening cooperation spaces—either proactively connecting with these regulated institutions and embedding themselves into the issuance and operational chains of banks and credit unions, or continuing to seek living space outside the framework while facing increasing regulatory and market pressures brought by the clearer "compliance comparison groups." Regardless of how various parties ultimately position themselves, the NCUA's move has already pushed credit unions onto the compliance payment track, shaping the boundaries and order of the next phase of U.S. crypto payment operations alongside banks on the unified stage built by the GENIUS Act.

Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。