Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano and Midnight projects, has mocked Bitcoin's post-quantum security strategy. In a direct response, he claimed that Bitcoin is choosing the least expressive and interesting post-quantum signature scheme over something more adaptable and future-proof. Design philosophy is the main point of contention.
SPHINCS quantum resistance
SPHINCS+ is a hash-based stateless signature system. Although it is thought to be safe from quantum attacks, it is heavy, inefficient, and has a restricted range of features. It is not as flexible for more complex scripting or composability as other post-quantum cryptographic systems. When Hoskinson refers to it as the least expressive, he is referring to this.
Lol, let's use the least expressive and interesting PQS to solve the quantum issue. Never change Bitcoin https://t.co/2mcytWyb12
HOT Stories Trader Who Predicted 700% XRP Rally is 'Cautiously Optimistic' Again; Strategy CEO Issues Bitcoin Teaser as BTC Price Unlocks $96,600 Outlook; Dogecoin Targets 34% Upside with Zero ETF Inflows - Morning Crypto Report Brian Armstrong: New Satoshi Doc is the Best Yet— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) April 21, 2026To put it simply, it resolves the specific issue of quantum resistance but does not significantly increase Bitcoin's potential.
On the other hand, Bitcoin developers are not optimizing for expressiveness. Reducing attack surface and upholding cautious, tried-and-true design principles are their top priorities. Because SPHINCS+ relies on simple hash functions rather than more intricate mathematical constructions, it fits that model. That simplicity is deliberate from a security perspective.
Hoskinson's position
According to Hoskinson, there was a chance to update the protocol more widely that was lost.
A practical trade-off also exists. Compared to existing ECDSA or Schnorr signatures, SPHINCS+ signatures are substantially larger, which may affect scalability and result in larger transaction sizes. That limitation supports the notion that this is a defensive rather than an innovative upgrade.
You Might Also Like
Wed, 04/22/2026 - 07:35 Schwartz Compares Arbitrum's Emergency to Bitcoin's 2010 BugByAlex Dovbnya
Large-scale quantum computers cannot yet crack the current cryptography used by Bitcoin. However, if more effective or adaptable post-quantum schemes develop in the future, selecting a rigid solution now could lead to conflict. Any decision made today will probably last for years due to Bitcoin's slow upgrade cycle.
From the price perspective, Bitcoin is currently in a recovery phase and is moving back toward the upper $70,000 range. Price action remains compressed under resistance, reflecting a market that is stabilizing but not yet trending decisively.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
