Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

ZachXBT vs RAVE: Is a clean cryptocurrency market really what Degens want?

CN
深潮TechFlow
Follow
1 hour ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.
Will eliminating manipulation save the crypto market, or will it drive away all the Degens?

Written by: Tiger Research

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresght News

Just after the RAVE token skyrocketed by 4500%, on-chain investigator ZachXBT exposed that the team wallets held 90% of the token supply and coordinated actions to transfer to centralized exchanges. Binance and Bitget promptly initiated investigations, leading to a more than 90% drop in the token’s price within a day.

However, a troubling question followed: If the market were completely cleared overnight, the extreme volatility that attracts retail investors would also disappear.

Many investors come to the crypto market not to pursue a stable 10% annual return similar to the S&P 500. What they seek are overnight profits of 4500%. ZachXBT's work is commendable, but do crypto speculators, the Degens, really want a clean market? This question deserves an honest answer.

In April 2026, just after the RAVE token surged 4500%, on-chain investigator @zachxbt publicly accused the project of manipulation.

Three wallets associated with the team held 90% of the total supply, and once these wallets transferred their holdings to mainstream exchanges, the price immediately soared. The subsequent liquidation reached $44 million. ZachXBT called for @binance, @bitget, and @Gate to conduct investigations and offered a $25,000 reward for related information.

Subsequently, Binance and Bitget launched investigations, causing RAVE to plummet from $26 to $1, a single-day drop of as much as 90%, evaporating $5.7 billion in market value. RaveDAO responded that the team did not engage in any manipulation.

Why It's Happening Now

Institutional funds are pouring into the crypto market, but hacker attacks have never ceased, and price manipulation repeatedly occurs. Doubts about "whether this market is trustworthy" have resurfaced.

It is worth noting that the resolution of this incident did not come from the SEC or other financial regulatory agencies, but from the actions of an anonymous on-chain investigator. He propelled the two exchanges to intervene, wiping out approximately $6 billion in market capitalization in just one day. The speed of individual action far exceeds that of regulation.

But this structure cannot be sustained in the long term. Market integrity cannot rely solely on individual goodwill.

An even more troubling question is: Do Degens really want this self-correcting mechanism?

A Simple Analogy

The crypto market is beginning to resemble a regulated stock exchange.

CCTV cameras are being installed, and institutional clients in suits are gradually entering. However, the first group of people filling the seats did not come because the place was "safe." They came because there was a possibility of achieving 45 times returns within an hour.

When every table is covered by cameras, the 45-fold returns will also disappear. The initial crowd will leave as well.

After that, will those institutional clients stay?

The Uncomfortable Truth

Ending manipulation like RAVE is necessary. When team wallets hold 90% of the supply and the prices immediately skyrocket as those chips are transferred to exchanges, it is almost manipulation; illegal manipulation should be removed from the market.

But why do most retail investors choose cryptocurrency over stocks? Not for a stable 10% annual return like the S&P 500. They are here to pursue the possibility of 4500% in a day. There are indeed many quality projects in the market, but extreme volatility often stems from information asymmetry, liquidity manipulation, and highly concentrated supply.

Imagine a crypto market fully regulated like the SEC: team wallets must fully disclose, highly concentrated supply projects are filtered before listing, and liquidity manipulation is marked in real-time. In such a market, which projects could still excite retail investors’ adrenaline? It would no longer be a crypto market, but a slow-moving stock market.

ZachXBT's work deserves recognition, and we agree with that. A safer market is indeed necessary.

But the uncomfortable truth remains: many people express the desire for a clean crypto market, but are actually drawn to that very volatility.

On the day when regulation is fully completed, the crypto market is more likely to become boring rather than clean. The surviving projects will be required to meet the same proof standards as listed stocks.

We are grateful for ZachXBT's work, but many Degens are still searching for the next RAVE-style skyrocketing curve in the market.

Currently, there is a significant gap between the future we long for and the market we actually have. If more projects can prove themselves based on their own strength, such extreme volatility should not be necessary.

That is the uncomfortable truth.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by 深潮TechFlow

1 hour ago
The largest IPO in history: In-depth study of SpaceX / xAI valuation logic, passive buying structure, and tokenized entry path.
1 hour ago
How can blockchain fill the gaps of identity, payment, and trust for AI Agents?
1 hour ago
DeFi Summer six years have passed, how will the decentralized finance revolution continue?
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarPANews
14 minutes ago
Hong Kong Web3 Carnival heated debate: Sun Yuchen predicts AI may crack Bitcoin in 2029, TRON rushes ahead of quantum blockchain.
avatar
avatar律动BlockBeats
15 minutes ago
The new leader of Apple at 50 years old.
avatar
avatarOdaily星球日报
18 minutes ago
2000-word testimony avoids discussing monetary policy, focus of the WASH hearing: why has the attitude towards interest rate cuts changed significantly?
avatar
avatarPANews
20 minutes ago
The GMO legendary prophet predicts again: AI cannot save the US stock market, the current market situation is as dangerous as in 2000.
avatar
avatarPANews
25 minutes ago
Forbes announced the 2026 AI 50 list, with OpenAI and Anthropic accounting for nearly 80% of the funding.
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink