Recently, two leading investment banks on Wall Street, JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs have successively raised their target prices and long-term expectations for gold. While maintaining its end-of-2026 forecast, JPMorgan increased its long-term price "anchor" level; Goldman Sachs attributed the upward momentum in gold prices to continuous central bank buying and macro risk hedging demand.

This is not just a correction of price judgment, but also a reconfirmation of the asset's role. When gold is placed back into the core position of "long-term reserve asset," a more worthy question for the on-chain world begins to emerge: Does on-chain finance already have the structural capability to carry reserve assets?

The rise of gold is driven by the strengthening of reserve logic

The recent adjustment in institutional expectations is not simply based on short-term supply and demand, but stems from more macro structural changes: fluctuations in monetary policy credibility, rising geopolitical risks, and the rebalancing of global asset allocation. Against this backdrop, gold is once again included in the context of balance sheets. It is no longer just a trading hedging tool but an allocated asset for value anchoring and long-term risk hedging.

When assets are redefined as reserve tools, market assessment standards also change— the focus is no longer just on volatility and liquidity, but on:

• Whether the structure is robust
• Whether the legal framework is clear
• Whether the verification mechanism is sustainable
• Whether it can operate stably across different market cycles

This also places higher demands on the on-chain version of gold.

RWA enters the second stage: from "can it go on-chain" to "can it bear"

The first stage of bringing real assets on-chain addresses the question of "can it be tokenized." Gold, as one of the most standardized physical assets globally, naturally became an early sample. However, as the reserve logic strengthens, discussions on-chain are beginning to shift to more fundamental issues: Can these assets support institutional balance sheets? Do they have operational capacity across cycles? Can they become the value anchor of on-chain finance?

In the "Matrixdock Outlook 2026," Matrixdock proposed the concept of the "Reserve Layer," which describes an on-chain foundational asset layer composed of regulated, high-quality, and verifiable tokenized assets. The goal of this layer is to provide value anchoring and liquidity support for on-chain finance while being able to operate stably across different market cycles. In other words, the Reserve Layer is not an asset stack but a type of structural standard.

Structural capability is becoming a watershed

Within this framework, "institutional-grade" is more about structural capability than a marketing label. Its core lies in whether the asset possesses:

• Bankruptcy-remote legal structure design
• Clear regulatory and legal framework support
• Independent third-party auditing mechanisms
• Redemption and circulation mechanisms that can operate under real market conditions
• Structural compatibility that supports institutional balance sheet holdings and integration

When gold is reintroduced by traditional institutions into the long-term reserve framework, whether the on-chain version meets equally rigorous structural and verification standards will become a crucial watershed.

XAUm: A structural practice for "reserve layer assets"

In this context, the design concept of Matrixdock Gold (XAUm) is noteworthy. In its Outlook framework, XAUm is constructed to fulfill the reserve function on-chain for gold assets, rather than merely being a digital representation of physical gold. Its structure emphasizes:

• 1:1 supported by physical gold that meets LBMA standards
• Adoption of a bankruptcy-remote legal structure design
• Stored by professional vault services
• Subject to independent third-party audits
• Combined with on-chain Proof-of-Reserve (PoR) mechanisms
• Verification and traceability of tokens and gold bars through Allocation Lookup tools

This design is more aligned with traditional institutional requirements for reserve assets rather than a mere pursuit of on-chain liquidity efficiency.

If a reserve cycle forms, the competitive logic may change

If this round of institutional revaluation of gold is not just a temporary judgment, but a structural strengthening of reserve logic, then on-chain finance may usher in a new cycle— this is unlikely to be driven by trading but rather a process of upgrading the foundational asset layer.

Then, the focus of competition may shift from scale and flow to:

• Who can build a regulated, verifiable Reserve Layer
• Who can provide institutional-grade structural capability
• Who can achieve cross-cycle stability standards at legal, custody, and verification levels

Reserve assets will not automatically possess reserve attributes simply by "going on-chain." They must earn that identity through structure, law, and verification mechanisms. Whether the Reserve Layer will become the core of the next stage of on-chain finance remains to be seen. But it is certain that, when traditional finance reinforces the strategic position of gold, the on-chain world is also undergoing a structural selection.

Reference Source:

https://www.thestreet.com/investing/goldman-sachs-revamps-gold-price-target-for-the-rest-of-2026

https://www.thestreet.com/investing/jpmorgan-revamps-long-term-gold-price-target

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。