Recently, within the same time window, several seemingly dispersed news stories overlapped: on one end is the Binance Alpha's second round of SUPERFORTUNE (GUA) airdrop initiation, with high thresholds refreshing retail participants' enthusiasm; on the other end is the National Bank of Canada reducing its holdings of over 1.04 million shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR), while the Federal Reserve proposes to remove “reputation risk” from bank regulations, opening up the imagination for crypto-friendly banks. In the surface market, Bitcoin fluctuates around the $60,000 mark, while crypto concept stocks are generally down pre-market, correcting their previous rampant rise. A deeper layer of conflict lies in: when the overarching narrative of traditional macroeconomics declines, how will funds renegotiate the risk-return structures of Bitcoin, related stocks, and on-chain native assets.
National Team Sells MSTR: Correction in Stock Prices and the Split of Bitcoin's Long-term Value
● Details of the sale and fund scale: Public information shows that the National Bank of Canada recently sold over 1.04 million shares of MSTR, with a disclosed cash realization amounting to about $127.8-128 million, while still retaining about 1 million shares, corresponding to a market value of approximately $122.7-123 million. This means that the so-called “national team” has not exited the market but is instead using a one-time large-scale reduction to lock in part of the book profits on MSTR as real cash flow.
● The attitude of reducing without liquidating: Choosing to reduce rather than liquidate reflects this traditional institution's complex judgment on Bitcoin and MSTR. On one hand, MSTR's stock price surged in tandem with Bitcoin in the last round, leading to a significant revaluation that carries technical adjustment pressure; on the other hand, still holding about a million shares indicates that it has not rejected the logic of Bitcoin as a long-term asset allocation target, but rather maintains a more cautious attitude towards the "degree of over-extension" in short-term pricing, shifting its position from an aggressive state back to a more neutral risk balance zone.
● The implications of the crypto concept stock correction: Research reports indicate that MSTR, along with crypto concept stocks such as COIN and MARA, fell pre-market by about 0.99%-1.98%. This can be seen as a relatively mild correction to the previous stock price surge, and can also be interpreted as the market pre-pricing the reality that “Bitcoin has struggled to surpass $70,000”—the stock market is taking a lead in shedding premiums, allowing for a buffer in the future fluctuations of spot prices. Regardless of the interpretation, they point to the same fact: institutions prefer to adjust stock positions first rather than directly selling on-chain spot.
● Inference boundaries and information constraints: Currently, public channels have only disclosed the scale of the National Bank of Canada's recent reduction and the amount of remaining holdings, without providing a more complete historical acquisition timeline or information about other institutions' simultaneous adjustments. Under this information constraint, any attempt to piece together a narrative of a “larger-scale institutional sell-off” will cross evidence boundaries. We can only discuss the emotional and risk preference range changes based on known price ranges and transaction data, rather than fabricate a non-existent “institutional stampede timeline.”
BTC Stuck Above $60,000: The Tug of War between Value Anchors and Growth Stories
● The techniques and sentiments of range-bound fluctuation: Wintermute's perspective points out that Bitcoin has recently oscillated back and forth in the $64,000-$67,000 range, failing to effectively break through the $70,000 resistance level. Technically, this narrow boxed range indicates a certain consensus between bulls and bears regarding the current valuation: strong pressure above and support below; sentiment-wise, prolonged high-level stagnation without new highs can easily shift from the optimism of "ready to take off" to the caution of “weak upward momentum,” prompting some funds to choose to realize part of their gains in peripheral assets—such as MSTR stocks—first.
● From high-growth story to “digital gold”: Wintermute also mentioned that the voices of “hard assets and value stocks outperforming software growth stocks” are rising in the traditional market. This shift in preference directly impacts Bitcoin's pricing narrative: once regarded as a type of “high-growth tech stock” risk bet, it gradually shifts to a value anchor role of “digital gold” and “macro hedge asset.” The price's tug-of-war in high ranges reflects that the market is redistributing valuation multiples in light of this narrative shift—growth premiums are receding, while store-of-value premiums are rising, with both finding a dynamic equilibrium between $60,000-$70,000.
● The pricing chain of spot stagnation and stock correction: When Bitcoin's spot remains high and stagnant while crypto concept stocks first correct, it essentially forms a “pricing chain of assets—derivative targets—risk previews”. Stocks, due to leverage effects, market sentiment, and regulatory expectations, are inherently more “front-loaded” than spots and are thus more suitable for probing the boundaries of risk. The pre-market decline range of 0.99%-1.98% may seem mild, but it releases a clear signal: before the spot makes directional choices, funds have already begun to hedge and discount the scenario of "if the breakout fails, volatility rises."
● Causal boundaries and parallel dynamics: It needs to be emphasized that this round of BTC range oscillation, the short-term style shift in US stocks, and the correction in individual stocks like MSTR should not be crudely tied to any single macro event (such as a meeting or a data release) as a necessary result. A more reasonable perspective is to view them as phenomena occurring in parallel under the same macro environment: funds oscillate between multiple narratives involving AI, de-globalization, and uncertain interest rate paths, while asset prices are constantly being repriced in this process. Market participants will explain fluctuations using their preferred “stories,” but this does not equate to a simple causal chain being reducible to a headline.
The Federal Reserve Eases its Discourse Power: Banks No Longer Pay the Price for "Stance"
● Proposal content and procedural rhythm: The regulatory proposal recently thrown out by the Federal Reserve removes “reputation risk” from bank supervisory considerations and sets a 60-day public comment period. In the past, “reputation risk” was often used to constrain banks from cooperating with industries seen as “politically sensitive” or “highly controversial”, but this concept has now been stripped away, indicating that regulators are more willing to refocus their attention on quantifiable and verifiable financial risks rather than subjective judgments about the values of customer groups.
● The significance for banks serving the crypto industry: One of the core propositions of the proposal is that “regulation should be based on substantive financial risks rather than customer political views,” which is undoubtedly a directional signal for banks willing to or currently servicing the crypto industry. This does not equal “encouraging banks to embrace crypto in large numbers,” but at least it reduces the institutional pressure to withdraw passively due to “reputation issues.” As long as the funding sources of crypto enterprises are transparent and compliance can be verified, banks will provide accounts, payment, and custody services based more on traditional credit and risk models rather than worrying about being penalized due to their clients’ “image.”
● Regulatory premium adjustments diluted by the Federal Reserve's influence: Against the backdrop of new narratives, such as AI, large models, de-globalization, and restructuring of the supply chain, constantly eroding traditional macro discourse power, the explanatory power of a single central bank's policy signals over asset prices is weakening. Yet precisely because of this, every seemingly “minor adjustment” in regulatory actions can marginally stir some asset classes' risk premiums. For crypto-related stocks and banks serving the crypto industry, such proposals mean that: the risks associated with policy tail events have shrunk, and long-term valuation discount rates are likely to decrease; even if the prices may not immediately reflect this in the short term, it can quietly change parameters in institutional models.
● Inference boundaries and quantitative challenges: The proposal is still in the 60-day comment period, and there is still uncertainty about its final effectiveness and the rollout of specific details. Without a clear implementation timetable and operational rules, it is challenging to offer rigorous quantitative estimates of the impact on a single bank or stock, nor should we directly infer “which banks will expand their global crypto business as a result.” A more prudent approach is to view it as part of the regulatory environment's directional improvement: the probability of risks stemming from “unexpected tightening” is decreasing, while the institutional resistance to compliant crypto businesses may gradually lower.
Binance Alpha Frenziedly Snatches GUA: Retail Investors Seek Chips in High-Threshold Activities
● Breakdown of the second round of airdrop rules: According to research briefs, Binance Alpha's second round of SUPERFORTUNE (GUA) airdrop has been initiated, with rule settings remarkably “intensive”: only users holding at least 256 points are eligible to claim 200 GUA on a first-come, first-served basis, where a single claim will consume about 15 points (from a single channel), and while not yet fully distributed, the platform will reduce the point threshold by 5 points every 5 minutes. This tiered threshold design strengthens the “early bird advantage” in terms of time, forcing interested participants to accumulate points in advance and get on board sooner.
● The flow alchemy of "tasks—points—redemption": Looking back at Binance Alpha's previous multiple activities, most follow the path of “completing tasks—earning points—redeeming airdrops/allocations.” Through this mechanism, the platform aggregates inherently fragmented user behaviors (browsing, interaction, trading, sharing) into measurable points, then responds in return with on-chain tokens or whitelist slots, creating a closed loop: traffic is financialized, participation is tokenized. In this round of GUA activity, the points threshold and consumption design continue to act as a “filter,” prioritizing resources for highly engaged and active user groups.
● Retail investor mentality amidst horizontal stagnation and corrections: On a micro level, this is a platform operational activity; in a macro context, it occurs during the high-level stagnation of Bitcoin and correction of crypto concept stocks—when the slope of mainstream assets slows down, and beta returns weaken. Retail investors remain willing to “roll points” for the high-threshold GUA airdrop, essentially preparing chips for the next round of narrative: when their confidence in BTC's further rise or stock price surges is not as strong, they will turn their attention to new tokens, new public chains, and new reward programs, hoping to seek excess returns from these assets with more narrative elasticity.
● Information boundaries and observational perspectives: Currently, public information does not provide the total amount of GUA tokens, specific distribution structure, or future unlocking pace, and any “precise simulation” of price expectations falls into high-risk speculation. Therefore, there is a conscious effort here to avoid making judgments about the long-term value of GUA itself, and instead focus on mechanism design and user behavior: how the points threshold filters participants and how the application speed reflects the degree of FOMO; these microdata are more helpful in depicting the current retail investors' risk preference and liquidity hunger than any hypothetical “tenfold coin story.”
Solana Ecosystem Media Suspension: Fragile Information Nodes on the Bustling Chain
● The situation of SolanaFloor's forced suspension: In sharp contrast to the airdrop frenzy at exchanges, within the same time window, the Solana ecosystem information platform SolanaFloor announced its suspension of operations, reasoning that its parent company suffered a theft. According to public statements, the platform will only retain archival access to existing content, ceasing daily updates. This signifies that a node that once played a “vanguard” role in Solana's market data, NFT data, and community sentiment transmission, has been forced to retreat from the ecosystem's front line.
● How fund safety undermines the foundations of content platforms: For content and data platforms, cash flow is often not robust; any financial security incident quickly erodes the minimum capital cushion needed to maintain operations, amplifying the internal team's fear of future revenue uncertainty. For external users, “parent company funds stolen” is not just a financial issue, but it also undermines the platform's trust capital regarding data integrity, objectivity, and sustainability—if an information source could disappear at any moment due to financial shocks, then the ecological connections built around it become fragile.
● The contrast between airdrop frenzy and infrastructure breakdown: Interestingly yet cruelly, on the same chain renowned for high performance and new narratives, there are players flocking to “opportunity windows” for various airdrops and new projects, while media and tool products providing continuous information services for the ecosystem collapse due to the broken cash flow. This contrast reveals a structural problem of public chain ecosystems: capital on the speculative end is highly active, while infrastructure and long-term information supply are easily overlooked and undervalued, and during market cycles of bullish and bearish transitions, the first to bear the pressure is often not the loudest narrative projects, but rather the intermediaries that silently maintain information transparency.
● Information gaps and ecological vulnerabilities: Currently, the scale of theft of the parent company of SolanaFloor, the specific methods of attack, and accountability have not been fully disclosed through public channels. Without grasping these details, it is impossible to make deeper technical attributions regarding the incident; we can only infer from the known result—an important ecological media has ceased operations—potential weaknesses in Solana's next round of bull-bear cycles: the excessive concentration of information and data services, weak anti-risk capital, and heavy reliance on external financing. If these issues are not addressed, even if the main chain indicators are impressive, it may be amplifying bearish impacts due to an “information black box” at critical moments.
From National Team to Retail Investors: The Repricing of Crypto Narratives in a Multipolar World
Connecting the National Bank of Canada's reduction of MSTR shares, the marginal loosening of the Federal Reserve's regulatory proposal, retail investors frantically pursuing GUA on Binance Alpha, and the suspension of Solana's ecosystem media due to funds being stolen, a picture of mutual growth and decline emerges: on one side, the traditional financial “national team” fine-tunes short-term valuations of crypto assets through stock positions; on the other side, on-chain native forces are seeking landing points for new narratives amidst regulatory gaps and platform incentives, while the information and infrastructure in the middle layer appear particularly fragile under financial pressure.
In such a structure, the overarching narrative power of the Federal Reserve indeed seems to be diminishing. AI and large models reshape productivity expectations, de-globalization rewrites supply chain logic, and on-chain native incentives reconstruct the pathways to capital formation in a series of airdrops and new public chain stories. Asset pricing thus becomes more fragmented and narrative-driven: at the same time, MSTR can correct due to institutional selling, Bitcoin can oscillate between $60,000 and $70,000, a new token can amplify participants' profit and loss curves due to airdrops, while information platforms on Solana may disappear from the ecosystem due to a hacker attack.
Looking ahead to the next period, Bitcoin is likely to continue contending within a high range, and prices may not yield one-sided trends, but the volatility itself will become the “corpus” for dialogues between institutions and retail investors. On the institutional level, they can adjust their beta exposure to crypto through stocks like MSTR or refine their positions in the spot market; retail investors will seek marginal chips that can leverage their personal asset curves in activities like GUA airdrops, as well as in the next wave of new public chains and new L2 narratives. The distinctions between bulls and bears may no longer be delineated by a few surges or collapses, but rather gradually emerge from the experiential differences gained by various participants within their own narratives.
In this multi-threaded, noisy signal environment, treating any single event—be it a national team reduction, a certain round of airdrop, or the suspension of a platform—as an absolute indicator of “top” or “bottom” will amplify interpretive biases. A more valuable observational perspective is to continuously track the changes of three main lines: how regulatory directions impact compliance costs and business boundaries at the detail level, how institutional position structures reflect risk preferences through stock and spot linkages, and how on-chain participant behaviors reshape liquidity distribution amidst airdrops, hacker attacks, and new narrative cycles. The real turning points are often not written in any news article but are buried within these slow yet ongoing structural changes.
Join our community, let’s discuss together and become stronger!
Official Telegram group: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefit group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefit group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
