On February 4, 2026, Eastern Standard Time, on-chain monitoring showed that three whale addresses concentrated their purchases and withdrew approximately $16.16 million worth of tokenized gold assets XAUT and PAXG within about 4 hours. The funds primarily flowed out from OKX and Binance, quickly transferring to on-chain addresses. This action occurred against the backdrop of Bitcoin's approximately 14% decline since the beginning of the year, and is seen as a high-frequency sample of crypto funds strengthening their risk-averse allocations, sparking a renewed discussion on the role of tokenized gold in asset portfolios.
$16.16 Million in 4 Hours: Whales Enter the Market
● Fund Scale Breakdown: According to Lookonchain, within a time window of about 4 hours, addresses 0x2788, 0x4E3c, and 0xDea3 collectively allocated approximately $16.16 million in tokenized gold assets. Among them, 0x2788 withdrew 1,500 XAUT from OKX, valued at about $7.58 million at the time; 0x4E3c withdrew 931.33 PAXG from Binance, approximately $4.75 million; and 0xDea3 purchased 732.8 PAXG on-chain, about $3.74 million, forming a complete funding puzzle for this round of concentrated buying.
● Withdrawal Path Analysis: In terms of the path, 0x2788 first established a position in XAUT on OKX, then transferred the entire 1,500 XAUT to a self-custody address; 0x4E3c, after forming a position of 931.33 PAXG on Binance, also chose to withdraw; 0xDea3 directly completed the purchase of 732.8 PAXG through on-chain liquidity pools or OTC matching, with the source of funds not further disclosed. Overall, exchange-to-on-chain wallet became the standard closed loop for this gold token allocation.
● Data Sources and Verification: The key data mentioned above comes from the public monitoring of on-chain data account Lookonchain, involving specific addresses, token quantities, and corresponding USD valuations, and has been cited by multiple media outlets such as TechFlow and Odaily, forming cross-verification. Currently, there is no authoritative institution providing more details, but in terms of amount and token scale, multi-source reports are generally consistent, providing a relatively solid factual basis for analysis.
Bitcoin's 14% Decline: Risk-Averse Positions Quietly Rise
● Time and Trend Comparison: According to Matrixport data, as of February 4, Bitcoin has cumulatively declined by about 14% since the beginning of the year, with significant volatility during this period. The three major addresses concentrated their increase in XAUT and PAXG within a single day, coinciding closely with Bitcoin's phase of decline, reinforcing the market's interpretation of it as a typical action to hedge against crypto asset volatility, especially during a window of weakened risk sentiment, where gold-related assets gained additional attention.
● Media Interpretation of Risk-Averse Logic: Several media outlets noted while following this large purchase that “the large buy of gold tokens may reflect the market's concerns about increased volatility,” suggesting that tokenized gold is being used by some funds as a hedging tool. Combined with Bitcoin's decline and the rising macro uncertainty, this narrative resonates with the timing of the whales' concentrated allocation, providing a relatively unified market explanation framework for “risk-averse positions entering.”
● Unclear Motives but Overlapping Narratives: It is important to emphasize that there is currently a lack of direct evidence regarding the true motives of the three whales, whether for hedging, arbitrage, or asset rebalancing, the outside world cannot provide confirmed judgments. However, from the outcome, their behavior of significantly increasing their holdings in gold tokens during Bitcoin's decline aligns closely with the narrative of “hedging volatility and embracing safety margins,” thus being quickly amplified in sentiment and influencing subsequent public opinion and expectations.
XAUT and PAXG: The Gold Substitutes in the Crypto World
● Basic Attributes and Price Anchoring: XAUT and PAXG are both tokenized products backed by physical gold, theoretically corresponding to a certain weight of physical gold reserves per token, and are promised by the issuer to be redeemable according to rules. Their price movements are closely anchored to international gold quotes, exhibiting highly correlated volatility characteristics with spot gold on-chain, allowing crypto investors to achieve similar gold exposure through holding tokens without directly engaging with traditional gold market infrastructure.
● Community View on Crypto-Native Hedging: In the discussion of this whale buying, there has been a notion in the community that “assets like XAUT/PAXG are becoming the risk-averse choice for crypto-native investors,” suggesting they are replacing some stablecoins and fiat outflows, becoming the preferred parking asset during periods of volatility. It should be noted that this view remains a market observation pending verification, lacking systematic statistical support, and is currently more based on individual cases and emotional inferences, requiring longer-term data tracking to draw conclusions.
● Roles, Advantages, and Limitations: In terms of asset allocation, tokenized gold possesses two major features: on-chain composability and gold value anchoring, making it easily integrable into DeFi, lending, derivatives, and other scenarios, compared to traditional gold, it is easier to allocate and adjust. However, its limitations are also clear, including reliance on the issuer's credibility and custody compliance, on-chain liquidity not matching mainstream assets, and potential price divergence risks with spot gold during extreme market conditions, which determine its suitability as part of a portfolio rather than a standalone risk-bearing tool.
Exchanges as Transfer Stations: From OKX and Binance to On-Chain
● Hub Role and Path Analysis: In this event, OKX and Binance played a key transfer role: the whales completed their positions in XAUT and PAXG on the exchange and then transferred the large positions to on-chain addresses, forming a path of “on-exchange position building—off-exchange custody.” This model indicates that leading exchanges not only provide price discovery and matching functions but also serve as the flow entry and distribution hub for large on-chain capital allocations in tokenized assets.
● Fiat Entry and Tokenized Asset Exit: Structurally, centralized exchanges connect fiat and mainstream crypto assets on one end, while directing funds towards tokenized gold and other on-chain assets through withdrawal functions, forming a typical “two-way channel.” Whales can complete multi-level conversions from fiat to BTC/USDT and then to gold tokens on the exchange, ultimately transferring assets to a self-custody environment through withdrawals, leveraging the liquidity advantages of exchanges while reducing long-term custody concentration risk.
● Potential Impact on Liquidity and Sentiment: The withdrawal of millions of dollars worth of XAUT and PAXG in a short time may temporarily compress the available liquidity of corresponding trading pairs on the exchange, amplifying short-term price volatility, and being interpreted by the market as a signal of “capital outflow from the exchange.” Although this scale is not sufficient to trigger systemic shocks from a platform-wide perspective, it may strengthen investors' associations with risk aversion and escape, thus amplifying effects on short-term trading behavior and position management.
OPN Heat and Gold Purchases: Two Main Lines of Fund Differentiation
● OPN Expectations and High Valuation Speculation: Almost simultaneously with the gold purchases, Binance announced that it will launch OPN-related activities on February 6, including Booster and Alpha airdrops, igniting market speculation enthusiasm for the new coin. Data from the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket shows that the market assigns an implied FDV of over $500 million to OPN with a probability of about 81%, reflecting strong expectations and speculative willingness for high-valuation new coins, forming a narrative line distinctly different from risk-averse assets.
● Contrast Between Speculation and Risk-Averse Entry: On one side is the fervent betting on high FDV new coins like OPN, while on the other side, whales quietly increase their holdings in XAUT and PAXG. This behavioral contrast during the same time period highlights the split in funds' risk preferences. Some funds choose to chase potential high beta returns driven by narratives, while others turn to gold tokens seeking safety margins in an environment of heightened macro and market uncertainty, forming a typical “offensive-defensive” dual-line parallel pattern.
● Structural Differentiation Between High FDV Pursuit and Risk-Averse Increase: Over a longer period, this structural differentiation of pursuing high FDV new coins on one side and increasing risk-averse assets on the other may become an important feature of this market cycle. Institutions and large funds may tend to allocate a portion of their weight to tokenized gold to smooth volatility, while small and medium investors focus more on high-risk assets like OPN, leading to more pronounced stratification between different assets in terms of funding sources, holder structures, and volatility characteristics.
Understanding the Next Round of Fund Preferences from a Whale's Large Order
● Signals of Risk Aversion and Reallocation: In summary, the three whales collectively bought or withdrew $16.16 million in gold tokens within about 4 hours, combined with Bitcoin's approximately 14% decline since the beginning of the year and macro uncertainty, releasing more signals of portfolio rebalancing and increased risk aversion. Tokenized gold was clearly chosen as an allocation target in this large order, indicating its emerging status as a “gold substitute” from the perspective of crypto funds.
● Data Limitations and Cautious Conclusions: It is important to remain clear-headed that there is still a lack of public data regarding the identity and historical holdings of the three addresses, and it is impossible to know their specific strategies and risk preferences, making all deductions about “institutional entry” or “complete style switch” highly uncertain. In the absence of complete data, a more reasonable attitude is to maintain cautious interpretations of the underlying motives and long-term trends based on confirmed factual foundations.
● Follow-Up Observation Indicators: Key dimensions to track moving forward include: first, whether more whales or institutional addresses continue to increase their holdings in XAUT and PAXG, forming continuity in buying; second, whether the overall market value of tokenized gold and its share in on-chain application scenarios continue to rise; third, during future periods of severe volatility, the capital flow and price resilience of such assets. Only when these indicators provide clearer signals can the true meaning of this whale's large order in the next market cycle be more accurately restored.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
