AI Oracle's Dilemma: Why Cryptographic Proofs are the Key to the Agent Economy?

The Dual Surge of AI Waves

The current Crypto space is being activated by two explosive narratives: the rise of autonomous AI Agent economies and the parallel prosperity of on-chain prediction markets. The wave represented by the x402 protocol is standardizing how agents "pay" for API calls. Meanwhile, platforms like Polymarket have proven that "pricing collective intelligence" is a multi-billion dollar market.

These two trends converge on a single, critical dependency point: data. AI Agents must consume external data to inform their decisions; a prediction market without a reliable oracle to settle its outcomes is utterly useless!

The popularity of x402 has turned this theoretical issue into an urgent reality: when an AI Agent can autonomously pay to call any API, how does it trust the results returned? This has given rise to a massive, high-risk demand: the need for an oracle that can reliably input external world (Web2) information into the blockchain (Web3).

The "Bug" of Traditional Oracles

This is precisely where mainstream oracle models, generally referred to as "reputation-based consensus," fall short.

Traditional oracles (like Chainlink) are designed for simple, public, and easily verifiable data. For example, to obtain the SUI/USD price, a decentralized oracle network (DON) only needs to have 20 independent nodes query 10 different exchanges and then report the median. If a node lies, it gets voted out.

However, when data becomes complex, private, and non-deterministic, this model collapses.

Suppose an AI Agent needs to execute a high-value trade based on a complex prompt sent to OpenAI:

• Privacy Bug: The agent cannot broadcast its proprietary prompt, and more critically, cannot share its API_KEY with 20 different nodes.
• Consensus Bug: Even if it could, 20 different nodes asking OpenAI the same complex question might receive 20 slightly different, non-deterministic answers. There is no "median" to vote on.

This forces the agent to do something that a trustless system absolutely cannot do: trust a single, centralized oracle node. The entire security of a multi-million dollar protocol now hangs on the "hope" that this single node has not been hacked, is not malicious, or has not returned a false result for convenience.

A Deeper Issue: Trust-Based AI Oracles

You might think: surely the solution is for the AI Agent to call the API directly?

But this idea is overly simplistic; smart contracts on Sui cannot issue HTTPS requests to OpenAI themselves. They are a closed, deterministic system. They must rely on an off-chain participant to "relay" the data.

The seemingly obvious solution is to create a dedicated "AI oracle" that is solely responsible for calling the API and relaying the results. But this does not solve the core issue. Smart contracts still blindly trust that node. They cannot verify:

• Did this node really call api.openai.com?
• Or did it call a cheaper, but malicious-looking server?
• Did it tamper with the response to manipulate a prediction market?

This is the real deadlock: the AI Agent economy cannot be built on "reputation"; it must be built on "proof."

Solution: DeAgentAI zkTLS AI Oracle

This is precisely the challenge that DeAgentAI, as a leading AI Agent infrastructure, is committed to solving. We are not building a "more trustworthy" oracle; we are building an oracle that does not require trust at all.

We achieve this by shifting the entire paradigm from reputational consensus to cryptographic consensus. The solution is a dedicated AI oracle built on zkTLS (Zero-Knowledge Transport Layer Security protocol).

The following diagram illustrates the complete interaction architecture between AI Agents, Sui smart contracts, off-chain nodes, and external AI APIs:

How It Works: "Cryptographic Notary"

Do not view DeAgentAI's oracle as a messenger; instead, see it as an internationally recognized "cryptographic notary."

Its technical workflow is as follows:

1. Off-Chain Proving: The DeAgentAI oracle node (an off-chain component) initiates a standard, encrypted TLS session with the target API (e.g., https://api.openai.com).

2. Privacy-Preserving Execution: The node securely uses its private API key (Authorization: Bearer sk-…) to send the prompt. The zkTLS proof system records the entire encrypted session.

3. Proof Generation: After the session ends, the node generates a ZK proof. This proof serves as the "notary's seal." It cryptographically proves the following facts simultaneously:

   "I connected to a server with an official certificate for api.openai.com."

   "I sent a data stream containing a public prompt."

   "I received a data stream containing a public response."

   "All of this was done while provably hiding (editing) the Authorization header, which remains private."

4. On-Chain Verification: The node then calls the on-chain AIOracle smart contract, submitting only the response and proof.

This is where the magic happens, as shown in the DeAgentAI architecture based on Move:

Code snippet

// A simplified snippet from DeAgentAI's AIOracle contract

public entry fun fulfillrequestwith_proof(

oracle: &AIOracle,

request: &mut AIRequest,

response: String,

server_name: String, // e.g., "api.openai.com"

proof: vector, // The ZK-proof from the off-chain node

ctx: &mut TxContext

) {

// --- 1. VALIDATION ---

assert!(!request.fulfilled, EREQUESTALREADY_FULFILLED);

// --- 2. VERIFICATION (The Core) ---

// The contract calls the ZKVerifier module.

// It doesn't trust the sender; it trusts the math.

let isvalid = zkverifier::verify_proof(

&proof,

&server_name,

&request.prompt,

&response

);

// Abort the transaction if the proof is invalid.

assert!(isvalid, EINVALID_PROOF);

// --- 3. STATE CHANGE (Only if proof is valid) ---

request.response = response;

request.fulfilled = true;

event::emit(AIRequestFulfilled {

request_id: object::id(request),

});

}

The fulfillrequestwith_proof function is permissionless. The contract does not care who the caller _is_; it only cares whether the proof is mathematically valid.

The actual cryptographic heavy lifting is handled by the zk_verifier module, which performs mathematical operations on-chain to check the "notary's seal."

Code snippet

// file: sources/zk_verifier.move

// STUB: A real implementation is extremely complex.

module myverifier::zkverifier {

use std::string::String;

// This function performs the complex, gas-intensive

// cryptographic operations (e.g., elliptic curve pairings)

// to verify the proof against the public inputs.

public fun verify_proof(

proof: &vector,

server_name: &String,

prompt: &String,

response: &String

): bool {

// --- REAL ZK VERIFICATION LOGIC GOES HERE ---

// In this example, it's stubbed to return true,

// but in production, this is the "unforgeable seal."

true

}

}

This architecture separates the AIOracle business logic from the ZKVerifier cryptographic logic, representing a clear modular design that allows the underlying proof system to be upgraded in the future without halting the entire oracle network.

Economic Impact: From "Data Cost" to "Trust Value"

Existing oracle giants (like Chainlink) excel in the "public data" market, where their core business is providing price data like SUI/USD for DeFi. This is a market based on "redundancy" and "reputation consensus" (N nodes voting), where the economic model is paying for data.

DeAgentAI, on the other hand, targets a new blue ocean: the incremental market (private/AI oracles). This is a market where AI Agents, quantitative funds, and institutions need to call private APIs, non-deterministic AI models, and confidential data. This market is currently almost zero, not because there is no demand, but because it is completely locked down by the "trust dilemma."

DeAgentAI's zkTLS oracle is not designed to compete in the "price data" red ocean with traditional oracles, but rather to unlock the trillion-dollar "autonomous agent economy" market that cannot be initiated due to a lack of trust!

Redefining Costs: "Gas Cost" vs. "Risk Cost"

Our zkTLS oracle verifies ZK proofs on-chain, which incurs considerable gas costs at this stage. This may seem like a "high cost," but it is actually a misinterpretation. We must distinguish between these two types of costs:

• Gas Cost: The on-chain fee paid for a verifiable, secure API call.
• Risk Cost: The cost incurred when an AI agent makes erroneous decisions due to trusting an opaque, centralized oracle node, resulting in millions of dollars in losses.

For any high-value AI Agent, paying a controllable "Gas Cost" in exchange for 100% "cryptographic certainty" is a far cheaper economic choice than bearing unlimited "Risk Costs."

We are not "saving costs"; we are "eliminating risks" for users. This is an economic form of "insurance," converting unpredictable catastrophic losses into a predictable, high-level security expense.

Why DeAgentAI: Why Are We Essential?

We address the most challenging yet often overlooked issue in the AI Agent economy: trust.

The x402 protocol resolves the friction of "payment," but that only completes half the task. An AI agent pays for data but cannot verify its authenticity, which is unacceptable in any high-value scenario. DeAgentAI provides the missing other half: a verifiable "trust layer."

We can achieve this not only because we have the right technology but also because we have proven its market viability.

First: We Serve a Mature Infrastructure, Not a Laboratory

DeAgentAI is already the largest AI agent infrastructure across the Sui, BSC, and BTC ecosystems. Our zkTLS oracle is not a theoretical white paper; it is built for the real, massive demand in our ecosystem.

• 18.5 million+ users (USERS)
• Peak 440,000+ daily active users (DAU)
• 195 million+ on-chain transactions

Our zkTLS oracle is designed for this already validated high-concurrency environment, providing the foundational trust services urgently needed by our vast user and agent ecosystem.

Second: We Chose the Right and Only Architecture from Day One, and our market leadership stems from our strategic choices in the technology roadmap:

1. Cryptographic Consensus vs. Reputation Consensus: We firmly believe that the "consensus" issue for AI agents cannot be solved through "social voting" (node reputation) but must be resolved through "mathematics" (cryptographic proof). This is our fundamental distinction from traditional oracle models.
2. Native Privacy and Permissionless: DeAgentAI's zkTLS implementation addresses the privacy issue of API keys at the protocol level, which is a rigid requirement for any professional-grade AI agent. Meanwhile, the permissionless nature of fulfillrequestwith_proof means we have created an open market that certifies proofs without recognizing individuals.
3. Modularity and Future Compatibility: As mentioned earlier, DeAgentAI's engineers have intentionally separated AIOracle (business logic) from ZKVerifier (cryptographic verifier). This is a crucial design. With the rapid development of ZK cryptography (such as STARKs, PLONKs), we can seamlessly upgrade the underlying ZKVerifier module to achieve lower gas costs and faster verification speeds without interrupting or migrating the smart contracts of the entire ecosystem. We are built for the AI development of the next decade.

Conclusion: From "Trust Messenger" to "Verification of Information"

DeAgentAI's architecture realizes a fundamental shift: from "trust messenger" to "verification of information." This is a necessary paradigm revolution for building a truly autonomous, trustworthy, and high-value AI agent economy. The x402 provides the track for payments, while DeAgentAI provides the indispensable "security and trust" guardrails on that track.

We are building the trustless "central nervous system" for this upcoming new economy. For developers looking to build the next generation of trustless AI agents, DeAgentAI offers the most solid foundation of trust.

Official Links:

• Website: https://deagent.ai/
• Twitter: https://x.com/DeAgentAI
• Discord: https://discord.com/invite/deagentaiofficial
• Telegram: https://t.me/deagentai
• CoinMarketCap: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/deagentai/
• Dune Analytics: https://dune.com/blockwork/degent-ai-statistics

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。