Boros has created a capital-efficient on-chain derivatives market for perpetual contract funding rates. By "tokenizing" the funding rates from off-chain exchanges into tradable "Yield Units" (YU), it essentially builds a market functionally similar to interest rate swaps (IRS) in traditional finance—allowing the farmers of Musang King durians to engage in a trading category that "bets" on a durian tree three times.

This protocol not only provides traders with new tools to hedge and speculate on funding rate fluctuations but also offers critical risk management infrastructure for Delta-neutral strategy protocols like Ethena that rely on funding rates.

In the short term, the better Ethena performs, the greater the trading volume for Boros.

1. The Rise of On-Chain Interest Rate Derivatives

1.1 Perpetual Contract Funding Rate: A Crypto-Native Interest Rate Benchmark

Perpetual contracts differ from traditional futures contracts in that they have no expiration date. To keep their prices anchored to the spot price of the underlying asset, a core mechanism called the funding rate is introduced. The funding rate is the fee exchanged periodically between long and short positions.

Its economic significance lies in the fact that the funding rate not only reflects market sentiment and leverage demand but also embodies the capital cost differences between the base currency and the quoted currency. A positive rate (longs paying shorts) typically indicates strong bullish sentiment or high leverage demand; a negative rate (shorts paying longs) indicates the opposite. The perpetual contract market processes hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume daily, making the funding rate a massive source of yield and risk that was previously not directly tradable, creating vast market space for derivative protocols built around it.

1.2 Similarities and Differences with Traditional Interest Rate Swaps (IRS)

Interest rate swaps (IRS) are derivative contracts in which two parties agree to exchange a series of interest payments based on a notional principal over a future period, typically one party pays a fixed rate while the other pays a floating rate. The global interest rate swap market is enormous, with daily clearing amounts exceeding $12 trillion.

The Boros protocol implements a functionally similar fixed-for-floating agreement. Users can choose to pay a fixed rate (i.e., the implied annualized yield) in exchange for a floating rate (i.e., the base annualized yield from centralized exchanges), and vice versa.

However, there are key differences between the two:

• Underlying Rates: Traditional IRS typically use benchmark rates like SOFR or ESTR. Boros uses the perpetual contract funding rate.
• Infrastructure: Traditional IRS operate in the over-the-counter (OTC) market, usually intermediated by banks and increasingly cleared by central counterparties (CCPs). Boros is built on an on-chain order book.
• Counterparty Risk: In traditional finance, counterparty risk is a major issue mitigated through legal agreements and collateral. In Boros, counterparty risk is managed algorithmically through a set of on-chain collateral, margin, and clearing systems.

1.3 Introduction to Boros: Pendle's Entry into Leveraged Yield Trading

Boros expands "yield trading" to include "funding rates" and introduces margin and leverage mechanisms.

For years, traders could only passively endure funding rates, treating them as a cost of trading or a source of income, without being able to trade them as an independent risk factor. Hedging operations were indirect and capital inefficient. Boros has made it possible to directly trade funding rate risk for the first time by providing a direct, capital-efficient tool (YU) and trading venue (on-chain order book). This is akin to the birth of credit default swaps (CDS) in financial history, which allowed banks to separate credit risk from underlying loans for trading. Boros is doing the same for funding rate risk in the crypto world.

The most core and powerful application scenario at this stage is providing institutional-grade hedging tools for Delta-neutral strategies like Ethena, which manages billions of dollars in assets. Whether Ethena can provide stable fixed income for its stablecoin USDe may partly depend on its ability to hedge funding rate risk on Boros.

1.4 An Analogy: The Musang King Durian Futures Market

To better understand Boros's core concept, we can draw an analogy with a hypothetical "Musang King Durian Futures Market."

Imagine a Musang King durian tree. This tree represents a revenue-generating underlying asset, much like the perpetual contract market on Binance.

• Future Durian Harvest: The uncertainty of how many durians this tree will produce in the future and their quality is akin to the uncertainty of future funding rates in the perpetual contract market. Sometimes the harvest is good (positive and high funding rate), and sometimes it is poor (negative funding rate).
• Durian Futures Contracts: Farmers and fruit merchants want to lock in the price of future durians to hedge against harvest uncertainty. Thus, they create a market specifically for trading contracts for "durian delivery on a specific future date." This contract is equivalent to the Yield Units (YU) in the Boros protocol.
• Futures Market Pricing: In this market, the price of durian futures contracts is formed through bidding between buyers and sellers. This price reflects the market's collective expectations for future durian harvests. This price is the implied annualized yield (Implied APR) in Boros.
• Actual Harvest Value: When the durians are ripe for picking, their actual value in the spot market is determined. This final, real value is the underlying annualized yield (Underlying APR) in Boros.

In this analogy, the Boros protocol plays the role of the durian futures market. It does not trade the durian tree itself (i.e., it does not trade BTC or ETH spot), but provides a platform specifically for trading the expectations of the "fruits" (funding rates) generated by this "tree" (the perpetual contract market) in the future. Traders can buy and sell expectations of future funding rates on Boros, just as fruit merchants buy and sell expectations of future durian harvests, allowing for speculation or hedging.

2. In-Depth Architecture Analysis: The Operating Mechanism of the Boros Protocol

This section will break down the technical components of Boros in detail, explaining how it transforms an abstract off-chain rate into a financial instrument that can be traded on-chain.

2.1 Tokenization of Off-Chain Yields: Connecting CEX Rates with On-Chain Assets

Boros relies on oracles to import real-time funding rate data from data sources like Binance/Hyperliquidi. This is a key centralized node and a potential manipulation vector, which the protocol addresses through specific risk parameters.

The clever design of Boros allows users to trade the changes or spreads between market expectations and actual rates, rather than the rates themselves. This transforms it into a powerful prediction market.

2.2 Yield Units (YU): The Basic Tradable Tool

Yield Units (YU) are the basic trading tool in Boros, representing the total funding rate income generated from a unit of notional principal (e.g., 1 BTC or 1 ETH) from the current time until the contract's expiration date.

Conceptually, Boros's YU is similar to Pendle V2's yield tokens (YT), as both represent tokenized future yield streams. However, unlike V2, Boros does not have a corresponding principal token (PT), making it a purely directional trading tool for yield. Trading YU allows users to speculate or hedge against the volatility of funding rates without directly taking on price risk of the underlying assets (like BTC or ETH).

Core Terminology of the Boros Protocol

2.3 The Duality of Rates: Deconstructing Implied APR and Underlying APR

The core dynamics of Boros trading stem from the interaction between two types of rates:

• Implied Annualized Yield (Implied APR): This is the YU price determined by market trading on the Boros order book, representing the market's collective expectation of the average funding rate before expiration. Traders are essentially going long or short on this implied rate.
• Underlying Annualized Yield (Underlying APR): This is the real-time funding rate obtained from the source exchange by the oracle, annualized for processing. It serves as the basis for periodic settlement of positions.

The profitability of a position depends on the difference between the Underlying APR at settlement and the Implied APR at the time the trader entered (in layman's terms: you are betting on the Implied APR):

• Long YU: If Underlying APR > Implied APR, then profit.
• Short YU: If Underlying APR < Implied APR, then profit.

2.4 Trading Infrastructure: On-Chain Order Book and Settlement Engine

Boros employs a fully on-chain public order book for peer-to-peer trading of YUs. This design provides transparency but also brings challenges related to gas costs and potential front-running trades. Additionally, the protocol has an automated market maker (AMM) to provide base liquidity.

The settlement process (also known as Rebase) occurs periodically according to the funding rate cycle of the source exchange (e.g., Binance every 8 hours). At each settlement, the system calculates profits and losses (i.e., the difference between Underlying APR and Implied APR) and directly adjusts the user's collateral balance.

This periodic settlement mechanism, combined with the existence of arbitrage opportunities, ensures that as the expiration date approaches, the Implied APR naturally converges towards the accumulated average of the Underlying APR. This is because the shorter the remaining time, the less uncertainty there is about future rates.

2.5 Capital Management: Cross-Margining and Clearing System

Boros supports leveraged trading (with an initial cap of 1.2x but designed to support higher leverage) and offers both independent and cross-margin account modes. Its margin system is designed to achieve capital efficiency, matching collateral requirements with expected payment risks (i.e., spread volatility) rather than tying them to the full notional exposure.

To conduct margin checks, the position value is determined by the "Mark Rate," which is a time-weighted average price (TWAP) derived from trades on the on-chain order book. This is a key defense mechanism against short-term price manipulation. If an account's margin level falls below the maintenance margin requirement, that account will face liquidation to prevent bad debt accumulation.

The architecture of Boros creates a self-referential yet externally anchored ecosystem. The trading price (Implied APR) is endogenously determined by participants on the Boros order book. However, the system's value and profits and losses are ultimately settled based on an exogenous, objective (oracle) data source. This dual structure of internal pricing and external anchoring is the core engine of the protocol. The 8-hour settlement mechanism acts as a "reality check," forcing speculative prices to reconcile with the actual off-chain rates.

3. Applications and Market Dynamics

3.1 Boros Trading Strategy Framework

Trading Strategy Matrix

In addition to the strategies in the table above, traders can also utilize the periodic patterns of funding rates (such as lower rates on weekends) for cyclical trading or engage in mean reversion trading when rates deviate from historical averages. Additionally, event-driven trading before significant market events (such as regulatory decisions) is also a common strategy.

3.2 Institutional Utility: Ethena Case Study and Delta-Neutral Hedging

Protocols like Ethena generate yield for their stablecoin (USDe) by holding spot ETH/BTC and shorting equivalent perpetual contract positions. Their primary source of income comes from the funding rates received as short position holders. However, this income is highly unstable; once the funding rate turns negative, Ethena faces significant losses.

Boros provides a solution for this. By shorting YU on Boros, Ethena can pay the (unstable) floating Underlying APR while receiving the (predictable) fixed Implied APR. This effectively converts their unstable income stream into a fixed, predictable income, allowing them to reduce treasury risk and even offer fixed income products to their users. This hedging capability is crucial for any entity operating "spot-futures arbitrage" or basis trading, including miners, stakers, and arbitrage funds, enabling them to lock in costs or revenues and enhance operational stability.

3.3 Assessment of Capital Efficiency Claims

Boros claims to offer extremely high capital efficiency, allowing users to hedge large notional positions with minimal collateral (officially advertised up to 1000 times). This efficiency stems from its margin model. In Boros, margin is calculated based on the potential volatility of interest rate payments rather than the full notional value of the underlying position.

However, the theoretical 1000x efficiency is an extreme marketing figure. Actual leverage and capital efficiency are strictly limited by the protocol's risk parameters, margin requirements, and initial leverage caps (e.g., initially set at 1.2x). True capital efficiency is dynamic and depends on market volatility.

4. Thoughts

The emergence of Boros creates a "meta game" and new dynamics on top of the existing perpetual contract market. It allows traders to not only speculate on asset prices but also to bet on the behavior and sentiment of other traders in the underlying perpetual contract market—the funding rate.

Since the funding rate is a direct result of the imbalance between long and short positions on centralized exchanges (CEX), trading YU on Boros is essentially a leveraged bet on the positions and sentiment of traders in markets like Binance or Hyperliquid. A trader going long on YU is effectively betting that the leveraged long demand on Binance will increase or decrease. This adds a new layer of complexity and opportunity, turning market structure and trader psychology into a directly tradable asset.

Interestingly, the existence of a robust funding rate hedging market may, in turn, suppress the volatility it relies on. Extreme funding rates are often caused by crowded one-sided trades. Large participants are often hesitant to increase their positions due to high holding costs (funding rates). With Boros, a large trader can now leverage long on a CEX (which would push up positive rates) while going long on YU on Boros to hedge this cost. This reduces the negative incentives to participate in crowded trades. As Boros liquidity deepens, it may stabilize funding rates, compressing extreme peaks and troughs, much like the mature IRS market stabilizes borrowing rates in traditional finance, or could it push crowded trades to another extreme?

Who knows?

Yet who cares?

p/s: Conflict of interest, the author holds $pendle.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。