WLFI is a project that combines political branding with decentralized finance, led by the Trump family, with a highly centralized structure.
WLFI is a project that combines political branding with decentralized finance, led by the Trump family, with a highly centralized structure. It rapidly amplifies its valuation through a capital circulation design with ALT5 and adopts a low circulation + high FDV token model. Although it has attracted institutional and crypto capital participation, it also comes with technical security, governance centralization, and potential regulatory risks.
1. Project Origin: The TRUMP FAMILY's Crowning Path in DeFi
From its inception, World Liberty Financial has deeply tied its core values to Trump's political brand, demonstrating that its strategic intent is not technological innovation, but rather leveraging a powerful brand identity for market penetration and capital raising.
1.1. Vision and Mission: "Financial Democratization" and Political Narrative
World Liberty Financial officially debuted to the public in September 2024, with its official positioning clearly stating that the project is "inspired by the vision of President Donald Trump." This brand positioning is not coincidental; it constitutes the project's most core unique selling point. Its publicly declared mission is to "achieve the democratization of DeFi" by creating user-friendly tools, aiming to attract mainstream Web2 users, and it has adopted the slogan "Make Cryptocurrency and America Great Again." This politically charged promotion shapes WLFI as an "anti-establishment" movement against the "manipulated" traditional financial system.
1.2. Core Leadership and Operations Team
The Trump family's involvement is direct and official. According to project documents, Donald Trump himself serves as the "Chief Cryptocurrency Advocate," while his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump act as "Web3 Ambassadors," and even his 18-year-old son Barron Trump has been given the title of "Chief DeFi Visionary." Could this be what they call a father-son team in action?!
The daily operations of the project are managed by a three-person core team, consisting of COO Zachary Folkman, Data and Strategy Chase Herro, and CEO Zach Witkoff. Notably, Witkoff is the son of Trump’s Middle East advisor Steve Witkoff, and whether there is any political connection here is open to interpretation.
1.3. Initial Strategy: Building a User-Friendly DeFi Lending Portal through Aave
The initial technical blueprint presented to the outside world was relatively simple. The first and only significant technical proposal put forth by WLFI was to launch an instance of the Aave v3 protocol. Aave is one of the most mature and battle-tested lending protocols in the DeFi space.
The core of this strategy is not to independently develop new DeFi technology, but to utilize Aave's existing, robust infrastructure and liquidity pools to build a simplified, user-friendly interface on top. The goal is to lower the barrier for users to enter DeFi, thereby massively onboarding new users. This strategy indicates that the project's initial focus was on rapidly acquiring users through brand influence rather than on underlying technological innovation.
This initially set, relatively conservative goal provides an important reference point for understanding the project's later significant strategic transformation. The initial lending narrative was simple and easy to understand, helping the project attract public attention and its first batch of funding in the early stages. However, this simple concept was soon replaced by a far grander and more complex plan to build a financial empire centered around stablecoins and publicly listed companies.
This shift suggests that the initial Aave plan may have been merely a "narrative foothold"—an easily accepted story for market entry, while the truly complex and profitable financial machine was being constructed behind the scenes. This is not a simple business evolution, but a fundamental transformation of the project's core business model—from a software service provider to a full-fledged financial institution.
2. Investor Constellation: A Mix of Institutions, Insiders, and Controversial Figures
The investor composition of World Liberty Financial is extremely complex, presenting a capital network composed of traditional financial institutions, project insiders, and controversial figures from the crypto world. This diversified capital structure provides funding for the project while also bringing significant reputational risks.
2.1. Trump Family's Controlling Stake and Financial Arrangements
The Trump family holds an absolute dominant position in World Liberty Financial. A Trump business entity named DT Marks DEFI LLC owns 60% of the company. More critically, this entity is entitled to receive up to 75% of all WLFI token sale revenues. This profit distribution model is extremely rare in startups, far exceeding typical founder equity incentives, ensuring that the vast majority of the financing proceeds will flow directly into the Trump family's pockets.
According to public documents and market data estimates, the paper value of WLFI tokens held by the Trump family has exceeded $6 billion, with Donald Trump reportedly controlling about two-thirds of that share. This figure makes the cryptocurrency business surpass real estate, becoming the Trump family's primary business interest.
2.2. Institutional Endorsement: A Cloak of Legitimacy
To shape its image of legitimacy in mainstream financial markets, WLFI successfully attracted participation from several well-known institutional investors. These include Point72 Asset Management, led by billionaire Steve Cohen, Hong Kong-based Soul Ventures, and DWF Labs, which invested $25 million. The involvement of these institutions provides a layer of traditional financial market recognition for this politically charged crypto project, becoming important capital for its external promotion and credibility building.
2.3. Justin Sun's Key Role: Investment, Advisory, and Regulatory Clouds
TRON founder Justin Sun is one of WLFI's cornerstone investors. He initially invested $30 million in the project, later increasing his total investment to at least $75 million. In return, Justin Sun was officially appointed as the project's official advisor, and the USD1 stablecoin subsequently launched by WLFI also chose to operate on the TRON network he leads.
The most notable aspect of this investment relationship is its subtle timeline of interaction with U.S. regulatory agencies. The SEC had previously filed a fraud lawsuit against Justin Sun and his companies. However, shortly after Trump took office, in February 2025, the SEC suddenly withdrew the case. Reports indicate that this decision surprised many officials within the SEC who were confident of winning the case. This series of events—from Justin Sun's massive investment in the Trump family business to the rapid disappearance of significant regulatory threats after the new U.S. government took office—has sparked widespread speculation about whether there was an exchange of interests.
This makes WLFI not just a business project, but potentially a tool for exerting political influence. For investors, this means that the project's success or failure may no longer depend on market performance or technological strength, but rather be closely tied to the political direction and regulatory decisions of the U.S. government, introducing an unprecedented and unquantifiable special risk.
2.4. Aqua 1 / Web3Port Controversy: Clouds of Suspicious Capital
Another controversial large investment comes from a UAE-based foundation, Aqua 1 Foundation, which injected $100 million into WLFI. However, an independent investigation report pointed out that Aqua 1 is linked to a Hong Kong market maker named Web3Port, which has been banned by several exchanges for alleged market manipulation. (https://www.theblock.co/post/362612/aqua1-web3port-world-liberty）
News reports claim that Aqua 1's co-founder "Dave Lee" and Web3Port's David Jia Hua Li are actually the same person, and both companies share the same server infrastructure. In response to these allegations, Aqua 1 and Dave Lee publicly denied any operational connections, stating that the reports "do not align with the facts," but did not specify which information was incorrect, citing "ongoing regulatory and compliance processes."
This strategic division of investor backgrounds reveals the project's complex fundraising strategy. On one hand, the project utilizes "clean" institutional capital from entities like Point72 to present its legitimacy and credibility to the public and traditional markets. On the other hand, it raises substantial funds from controversial figures like Justin Sun and rumored connections to tainted entities like Web3Port.
3. Strategic Evolution: Transitioning to a Stablecoin-Centric Ecosystem with USD1
The World Liberty Financial project has undergone a crucial strategic transformation, evolving from a simple application layer project to a grand ecosystem dedicated to building underlying financial infrastructure, with the core being the USD1 stablecoin.
3.1. From Lending Front-End to Financial Infrastructure
The project's initial narrative was to provide users with "access to third-party DeFi applications," making it appear as a portal or aggregator for the DeFi world. However, this narrative underwent a fundamental shift in March 2025, when the project team officially announced the launch of its native stablecoin USD1 and committed to building a "next-generation financial platform." This transformation marks a qualitative leap in the project's ambition, scope, and risk profile.
3.2. In-Depth Analysis of USD1 Stablecoin: Mechanism, Custody, and Growth Drivers
Mechanism: USD1 is a fiat-collateralized stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar. Its reserve assets consist of short-term U.S. Treasury bills, dollar cash deposits, and other cash equivalents. This is a conservatively recognized and mature stablecoin model in the industry, similar to leading players like USDC and USDT.
Custody: To enhance its credibility, the reserve assets of USD1 are held by the well-known digital asset custodian BitGo. BitGo has a good reputation among institutional clients, and its involvement provides an important layer of security for USD1's assets.
Growth: USD1 has achieved remarkable growth since its launch. After going live in March 2025, it surpassed a market capitalization of $2.1 billion in just over a month, being touted as "the fastest-growing stablecoin in history."
Key Growth Drivers: However, this explosive growth does not stem from widespread organic market adoption. The vast majority of its market capitalization comes from a single, massive transaction: a $2 billion investment agreement between the Abu Dhabi investment company MGX and Binance, which specifies the use of USD1 as the sole medium of exchange. The second factor is the activity of USD1 on the BNB CHAIN.
Lack of Transparency: Although the project team has promised to conduct regular third-party audits, as of May 2025, no public, detailed audit report or asset proof outlining the composition of USD1's reserves has been seen in the market. For stablecoins, reserve transparency is the lifeline for maintaining user confidence. Later, in June 2025, a co-founder stated that the audit report had been received and would be published soon, but this still reflects the project's lag in disclosing key information.
This strategic transformation reveals the true economic position of the stablecoin within the WLFI ecosystem. The WLFI token itself is clearly defined as a pure governance token, without any economic rights attached. So, what is the engine that creates value for the Trump family's 60% controlling business entity? The answer is the USD1 stablecoin.
Like the business models of Tether and Circle, the issuers of fiat-collateralized stablecoins can generate substantial income by investing reserve assets in interest-bearing financial instruments such as U.S. Treasury bonds. Therefore, the stablecoin is not just a product of WLFI; it is the core engine upon which the entire enterprise relies for survival and cash flow. The shift from a lending narrative to a stablecoin was an inevitable choice for building a sustainable business model.
However, this growth model also brings significant risks. The so-called "fastest-growing" narrative is a product of financial engineering, rather than a result of natural market selection. Its market capitalization is highly dependent on a single transaction with MGX/Binance, which means that the liquidity and stability of USD1 are deeply tied to a very small number of institutional counterparties, creating severe systemic risks. Unlike USDC or USDT, which are integrated into thousands of protocols and widely used by millions of users, USD1's foundation is both narrow and fragile. Any fluctuation in its relationship with MGX or Binance could trigger a catastrophic collapse in its perceived value and utility.
3.3. Ecosystem Partners and Integration
To build its DeFi ecosystem, WLFI actively establishes partnerships with other leading blockchain protocols, with partners including Ondo Finance, Ethena, Chainlink, Sui, and Aave. Additionally, the project has created a diversified digital asset reserve through its "macro strategy," holding a variety of mainstream crypto assets such as BTC, ETH, TRX, LINK, SUI, and ONDO.
4. ALT5 Sigma Mechanism: Building a Siphoning Tool for the Public Market
The transaction between World Liberty Financial and Nasdaq-listed ALT5 Sigma is at the core of the project's financial engineering, with a complexity and non-traditional design that is extremely rare in both the cryptocurrency and traditional financial markets. This mechanism aims to create a tradable public market proxy for the illiquid WLFI tokens and establish its market valuation through a sophisticated capital closed loop.
4.1. $1.5 Billion "Cryptocurrency Vault" Transaction Analysis
In August 2025, WLFI effectively completed a control acquisition of ALT5 Sigma (ALTS). ALT5 Sigma is a company that originally engaged in pain treatment but later transformed into a payment technology firm. The core content of the transaction is that ALT5 announced it would raise $1.5 billion through a targeted issuance and a simultaneous private placement to implement a "WLFI Vault Strategy."
As part of the transaction, WLFI's core executive team fully joined ALT5's leadership: WLFI CEO Zach Witkoff became the chairman of ALT5's board, and Eric Trump became a board member.
4.2. Capital Circulation: How WLFI Funds Its Vault
The cleverness of the transaction lies in its designed capital circulation mechanism, with specific steps as follows:
Step One: WLFI Exchanges Tokens for Equity. World Liberty Financial participated as the lead investor in ALT5's private financing. However, the consideration it paid was not cash, but $750 million worth of WLFI tokens issued by itself. Through this non-cash transaction, WLFI exchanged for ALT5's stock and warrants.
Step Two: ALT5 Raises Cash from External Investors. At the same time, ALT5 raised another $750 million in cash from other external institutional investors through a targeted issuance.
Step Three: ALT5 Uses the Raised Cash to Repurchase WLFI Tokens. Finally, ALT5 will use the $750 million cash raised from external investors to directly purchase more WLFI tokens from World Liberty Financial to enrich its so-called "corporate vault."
This process forms a perfect capital closed loop: WLFI gains control of a publicly listed company using tokens it created at zero cost; then, this publicly listed company uses the real cash raised from the public market to buy back WLFI tokens. This operation not only creates real demand for WLFI tokens but also assigns a public market price to them through the trading actions of the listed company.
4.3. Strategic Goal: Creating Valuation and Liquidity for Illiquid Assets
Before the transaction with ALT5, WLFI tokens were set as non-transferable, meaning there was no price in the market. The ALT5 transaction was the first to assign an official valuation to WLFI tokens—$0.20 each. This price was set by the trading parties (essentially the same controlling party), but because it occurred within the framework of a publicly listed company, it created considerable paper wealth for the billions of tokens held by insiders.
This structure mimics MicroStrategy's strategy of transforming the company into a Bitcoin proxy stock. It effectively turned ALTS's stock into a public market trading proxy for WLFI tokens. Investors can gain indirect exposure to WLFI by purchasing ALTS stock, thus solving the early liquidity problem of WLFI tokens.
This mechanism is a perfect combination of regulatory arbitrage and financial alchemy. Its core lies in using a regulated public market to endorse and price an unregulated crypto asset. By orchestrating a transaction in which a Nasdaq-listed company acquires WLFI tokens at a specific price, the project team has created a verifiable valuation that even needs to be reported to the SEC. This is akin to financial alchemy: transforming a self-issued, illiquid digital token into an asset with verifiable paper value, which can then be used for collateral, included on balance sheets, or serve as a basis for further financing.
Former SEC officials have raised serious warnings about this transaction, pointing out that its inherent conflicts of interest "bring the worst practices of the crypto ecosystem into the regulated public market." However, from the project team's perspective, this conflict of interest is not a flaw but a core feature of the mechanism's design. Since the same group controls both the asset seller (WLF) and the buyer (ALT5), they can completely dominate the transaction terms for their own benefit. This is not a fair trade but a carefully orchestrated performance, with the sole purpose of achieving specific financial goals for WLF insiders (i.e., creating valuation and liquidity). This structure poses significant risks to external investors in ALTS, as their capital is being used to support an asset controlled by a management team with inherent conflicts of interest. (https://www.mitrade.com/au/insights/news/live-news/article-3-1083176-20250901)
5. WLFI Token Economics: Supply, Distribution, and Utility Analysis
The economic model of the WLFI token is filled with contradictions and opacity, with its supply distribution and release mechanisms seemingly designed to create maximum market advantages for insiders.
5.1. Total Supply and Contradictory Distribution Model
The total supply and maximum supply of WLFI tokens are both 10 billion. However, there are two completely different and contradictory versions circulating in the market regarding how these tokens are distributed:
According to a public statement by project partner Chase Herro, the token distribution plan is: 63% sold to public investors, 17% for user rewards, and 20% reserved for the project team.
5.2. Token Sale Rounds and Early Investor Distribution
The WLFI project has successfully raised a total of $550 million from over 85,000 KYC-verified participants through multiple rounds of token sales as of March 2025. However, its early sales process was not smooth. A sale event in October 2024 was chaotic due to website crashes, raising only over $8 million, far below its set target of $300 million.
Early investors acquired tokens at extremely low prices, including rounds at $0.015 and $0.05 each. This means that once the tokens are listed for trading, these early investors will hold significant unrealized gains.
5.3. Token Release Plan: Unlocking on September 1 and Future Lockups
According to the project team's announcement, WLFI tokens are scheduled to begin trading in the market on September 1. This initial unlocking specifically targets early investors: 20% of the tokens they purchased in the $0.015 and $0.05 rounds will be released and become tradable. Notably, the delivery price between ALTS and WLFI is $0.20.
The number of tokens unlocked this time accounts for about 5% of the total supply of WLFI. This is a key design, as it ensures that the circulating supply at the time of listing (i.e., the "float") is extremely low. Meanwhile, the tokens allocated to founders, team members, and advisors will remain locked at the time of listing to prevent immediate sell-offs. The remaining 80% of tokens held by investors will also continue to be locked, with the specific release schedule to be determined by future community governance votes.
This token release arrangement is meticulously designed to create a "low circulation, high FDV" market dynamic. By unlocking only a tiny portion of the total supply (about 5%), the circulating tokens are artificially kept in a state of scarcity. At the same time, the project's strong brand background and institutional investor endorsements create significant market enthusiasm, thereby driving up its price in the futures market and overall FDV. This "low circulation, high FDV" situation is a classic breeding ground for market manipulation. A small amount of buying pressure can trigger a sharp rise in token prices. This price surge is highly beneficial for insiders, as it can greatly inflate the paper value of their large locked token holdings, even if these tokens cannot be sold temporarily.
5.4. Utility Analysis: A Pure Governance Token Without Economic Rights
The official positioning of the WLFI token is very clear: it is a purely governance token. Holders have the right to vote on the future direction of the protocol but do not have any rights to share in the protocol's revenue, dividends, or other economic benefits. Its only utility is to participate in platform governance voting.
However, this "governance" utility may be nothing more than an illusion in reality. Given that insiders hold a massive and highly concentrated share of tokens, the outcome of any community vote is effectively predetermined. The founding team and their allies will always have enough votes to dominate any decision. Therefore, for ordinary retail investors, the "governance" function is essentially meaningless. The true purpose of the token is not decentralized governance but rather to serve as a tradable speculative asset. Its value derives entirely from market sentiment and the Trump brand effect, while its price dynamics are precisely managed by the project team through controlling the pace of supply release.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
