On September 1, the news of World Liberty Financial (WLFI) token officially launching once again drew the entire crypto market's attention to the Trump family. In just six months, this project, initially regarded as merely an "Aave fork," has evolved from a marginal attempt into a core piece of the Trump family's crypto strategy.

The drama of the story lies in its background. Just a year ago, the market's impression of Trump's involvement in crypto was still at the level of jokes like "Trump Coin." However, as Trump prepares to return to the White House, his family has not settled for speculative NFTs or meme coins but has chosen stablecoins, lending, and treasury-like assets as their financial infrastructure. Consequently, WLFI's positioning has transformed from a simple lending protocol to a "DeFi super application" attempting to integrate stablecoins, treasury assets, trading, and payments.

This shift is not just about the launch of a protocol; it marks a significant event of political and capital collaboration. Trump's son personally attended a conference in Hong Kong, becoming a star on the Asian Web3 stage; the Abu Dhabi sovereign fund invested $2 billion in Binance using WLFI's stablecoin USD1; crypto OGs like Sun Yuchen, DWF Labs, and Ryan Fang have all shown support. The high binding of political resources and crypto resources has allowed WLFI's influence to far exceed that of an ordinary DeFi project.

Why should we pay attention to WLFI? Because it reveals a brand new proposition: when the family of a U.S. president personally gets involved, will stablecoins be redefined? When capital, policy, and narrative are bundled together, will the order of the crypto industry be rewritten as a result?

Recently, BlockBeats and "Web3 101" jointly produced a new podcast episode, where host Liu Feng and dForce founder Min Dao delved into the more complex context behind WLFI's rise, its practical logic, narrative techniques, and potential risks. The following viewpoints are derived from the podcast content (Listen to the podcast: "E60｜Talking Again About Trump and WLFI: Is the Presidential Inner Circle Here to Reap the Fruits of the DeFi Revolution?":

The Trump Family's Panoramic Layout

The Trump family's move into the crypto world was not a spur-of-the-moment decision but rather a clear strategic logic. As early as October 2024, before Trump was re-elected as president, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) had already been publicly announced. At that time, market enthusiasm was not high, and the ICO took some time to sell out, but the project's positioning was already becoming apparent: almost all members of the Trump family were listed as so-called "Co-Founders," showcasing their strong commitment and ambition for the project.

From an overall layout perspective, WLFI continues the Trump family's "consistent approach" in the crypto world—almost every major sector is being tapped: from the initial Trump meme coin to DeFi protocols, stablecoins, Bitcoin mining, and even treasury companies, it essentially covers the entire panorama of the crypto world. WLFI is the project that best reflects this ambition, evolving from a simple Aave fork into a "full matrix" DeFi Super App, with ambitions far exceeding initial expectations.

Now, it is not only preparing to launch a stablecoin but is also linked to the treasury model of DAT, seemingly becoming the most practical flagship product in the family's crypto layout. As for token distribution, the specific holdings of the family have not been disclosed, but it is widely believed that WLFI is similar to Trump Coin—aside from investors and the ICO public offering, the majority of shares remain firmly in the hands of the Trump family. In other words, although there are some co-founders and external investors involved, the real control still lies with the Trump family and their closest allies.

What is the relationship between WLFI and Trump and his family?

Although President Trump himself is listed as a "Co-Founder" of World Liberty Financial (WLFI), he does not directly participate in the project's daily operations. From the information disclosed by the team, the core lineup is jointly led by the Trump family and the Witkoff family, which has over forty years of experience in New York real estate, along with a few close allies like Dolomite and some old friends who have navigated the crypto industry. In other words, the project's framework is not a makeshift assembly but is built on deep family ties and long-term business connections.

As the team gradually expands, WLFI's network quickly extends to the native forces of the crypto world, especially within the Chinese community. Ankr founder Ryan Fang, Paxos co-founder Rich Teo, and Scroll founder Sandy Peng all sided with the camp early on. There are even rumors that the project initially planned to launch on the Layer2 chain Scroll developed by a Chinese team, but it later faded from public view. More widely known are Sun Yuchen and the controversial market maker DWF Labs, who also have a close relationship with WLFI. DWF not only invested in the project's tokens but also quickly launched WLFI's stablecoin USD1 on its platform Falcon Finance.

At a higher level of resource mobilization, WLFI has also connected with the Abu Dhabi sovereign fund MGX. In March 2025, this fund invested $2 billion in Binance, and the settlement method for this investment was through the Trump family's stablecoin USD1. This operation caused USD1's market value to soar from $100 million to $2 billion in a very short time, with over 90% of the reserves directly held on Binance's account. Subsequently, Binance provided numerous application scenarios for USD1 on the BNB Chain, ranging from meme coin liquidity adjustments to new service offerings. Exchanges like Huobi (HDX) quickly followed suit, launching USD1 at the earliest opportunity. Falcon Finance even incorporated it into its collateral system, allowing users to borrow directly using USD1.

The effectiveness of this approach was immediate. Leveraging the political and business influence of the Trump family, along with the resource tilt from Binance, DWF, and Sun Yuchen, USD1 established a circulation network across the entire crypto market in just a few months. Whether it is top-tier exchanges or second and third-tier platforms, they are all rapidly integrating this emerging stablecoin. It can be said that WLFI has turned the originally complex and challenging promotion of stablecoins into a "fast track" driven by resource players working together through this "family endorsement + global resource integration" model. This is also one of the key reasons why WLFI has quickly gained popularity in a short time.

In just six months, how did WLFI rapidly open up its ecological landscape?

In the past six months, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has delivered a performance that the entire DeFi industry envies. For most DeFi products, gaining user adoption and forming effective ecological support often requires a long accumulation: there must be exchanges willing to support it, and other protocols willing to integrate, especially for stablecoins, which are a "hard-fought sector," opening up the market is almost a protracted battle. However, WLFI has managed to fully roll out in the market in just six months, which is rare in the fiercely competitive crypto world.

So, what exactly is WLFI? What are its product logic and development path? If we trace back to the beginning, WLFI was initially just a simple fork of Aave. Aave is one of the most classic lending protocols in the crypto world, allowing users to collateralize assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum to borrow stablecoins. WLFI's starting point was almost a direct copy of Aave's model, positioning itself as a standard DeFi lending project. However, as the project progressed, it gradually expanded into more ambitious directions, especially with the issuance of stablecoins. WLFI's stablecoin USD1 attempts to compete with mainstream stablecoins like USDT and USDC, becoming an important strategic pivot.

At the same time, WLFI has also crossed into the traditional financial market by establishing a publicly listed coin stock company in the U.S., Alt5 Sigma Corporation, and plans to use WLFI tokens as reserve assets, following a path similar to "MicroStrategy's flywheel." The team even announced plans to venture into crypto payments, almost incorporating all possible hot topics into its blueprint. It can be said that WLFI has evolved from a simple lending protocol into a state of "issuing tokens while revising the white paper." With each version update, its vision has become increasingly grand, moving towards a "fully matrixed DeFi Super App": with a stablecoin, it can extend to interest-bearing products, treasury products, lending, arbitrage, and even potentially expand into trading and derivatives, constructing a "super application" that covers all sectors of DeFi.

From an industry linkage perspective, other businesses of the Trump family are also interacting with WLFI. For example, Trump’s media technology company, Trump Media & Technology Group Corp (DJT), valued at several billion dollars, has also begun to explore integrating crypto payments. In the future, the family's coin stock company may likely connect with WLFI's stablecoin and lending products, forming a closed loop between the family’s industries and the DeFi protocol. This "industrial chain complementarity" not only provides WLFI with practical scenarios but also strengthens its financial ecological ambitions.

In terms of external narrative, the WLFI team consistently emphasizes that their mission is to "Bank the Unbanked"—to enable those who cannot access traditional financial systems to obtain financial services through DeFi and Web3. This slogan is not new; it is almost a cliché in the crypto industry. However, if we closely observe WLFI's actual progress, we will find that its execution process is far more complex than the slogan suggests.

Initially, WLFI was merely a copy of a lending protocol, but it quickly entered the stablecoin sector. Its USD1 stablecoin adopts a centralized issuance model similar to USDT and USDC: users give dollars to the team, and the team issues an equivalent amount of USD1 on-chain. This model is not novel, but thanks to its strong resource and capital integration capabilities, USD1's scale skyrocketed from $100 million to $2 billion within days, refreshing the market's perception of "speed."

However, if you open the WLFI official website today, you will find that most products are still in a "Coming Soon" state: whether it's lending or exchanges, they are still in the "coming soon" phase. In other words, most of WLFI's product matrix has not yet truly landed. At the same time, however, its influence and narrative have already permeated the entire industry: the stablecoin has been launched, and the token has completed multiple rounds of sales, bringing significant revenue to the project and landing on top global exchanges on September 1.

This is the realistic portrait of WLFI—a DeFi project with a grand story and broad vision, but whose products are still in the brewing stage. Its model resembles "first drawing the pie, then creating momentum," and then quickly cashing in the pie into real influence using political resources and capital alliances. Although specific applications are still limited, it has already become a hot topic in the market due to the explosion of USD1 and the binding of family resources. In other words, WLFI may still be in the "blueprint stage of city building," but the shadow of this city is already quite eye-catching.

From DeFi protocols to stablecoins, is the concept of "Bank the Unbanked" just a slogan?

Many people think that the Trump family's involvement in DeFi is merely a speculative act to ride the wave of trends. However, based on the development path of World Liberty Financial (WLFI), this judgment is not accurate. Trump has indeed dabbled in NFTs and meme coins in the past, which seem more like short-term operations chasing market sentiment; however, WLFI's positioning is clearly different. It is the most strategically significant piece in the family's crypto landscape, not only large in scale but also carrying a sense of real pain and long-term consideration.

The reason traces back to the acute pain of being "debanked." After Trump's first term ended, hundreds of the family's bank accounts in the U.S. were closed overnight, and their real estate company lost basic account services from traditional financial giants like JP Morgan and Bank of America. When Trump's son recalled this scene in an interview, his eyes were filled with anger. Whether due to political retaliation or regulatory reasons, this "DeBank" incident made the Trump family acutely aware that the traditional financial system was not reliable for them. If Trump were to leave office in 2028 and the Democrats were to regain power, similar crackdowns could very well happen again. Traditional industries like real estate and media have almost no defense in such situations, but if the family's core assets have already shifted to the crypto world, the situation would be entirely different. Therefore, the business they are engaged in is directly related to their past painful experiences, making the decision to build WLFI a very logical one from the Trump family's perspective.

The history of cryptocurrency growth is itself a history of struggle against traditional banking. From China to the U.S., from regulatory crackdowns to policy blockades, crypto has risen amidst expulsion and resistance, ultimately giving birth to today's $4 trillion market and a complete DeFi infrastructure. The Trump family is well aware of this, and thus they began to shift their business focus to the crypto track. This is not only a defensive choice but also an offensive layout: pushing legislation during their term to embed crypto finance into the U.S. legal system, ensuring that even with a change of regime, the family's crypto empire can still receive institutional protection.

From this perspective, WLFI is not a spur-of-the-moment speculation but a "both realistic and strategic" decision. It not only frees the family's wealth system from dependence on banks but also leaves a firewall against future uncertainties. More importantly, compared to simply investing in existing protocols like Aave, WLFI represents a true entrepreneurial venture. The project's value lies not only in the token itself but also in binding Trump's political influence with global crypto resources through stablecoins, lending, derivatives, and other businesses, with a potential upside far exceeding that of simple investments.

How does Trump monetize the influence of the U.S. presidency?

If one truly understands the considerations of the Trump family, it becomes clear that World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is not a simple crypto speculation but a massive strategic chess game. Currently, they leverage Trump's influence as the U.S. president to transform this political and social capital into a new way of resource monetization. The term "monetization" should be put in quotes, as the family may not necessarily agree with this characterization, but to the outside world, it indeed represents a path to capitalize on influence.

The brilliance of this path lies in its ability to not only bring attention to the family but also attract the most powerful participants in the crypto world to stand in support. By leveraging the aura of the presidential term, they first accumulate influence in crypto, and then, through the anti-censorship and anti-government intervention characteristics of blockchain, build a firewall for future business interests. Thus, even after Trump leaves office, the family can maintain a continuous moat.

Even smarter is the Trump family’s strategy of placing their influence in the global market. The real estate and media businesses are highly dependent on localization and the banking system, while the nature of crypto is decentralization and globalization, allowing influence to be capitalized most effectively on a global scale. For example, at Trump's private dinners, 30% to 40% of the attendees are of Chinese descent, and WLFI's supporters are also highly concentrated in the Asian market—especially in offshore exchanges in Greater China. The global reach brought by cryptocurrency is far more efficient than traditional real estate projects.

Behind this, figures like Binance's CZ and Sun Yuchen from the Chinese OG camp play a key role. Currently, the main use cases for WLFI's stablecoin USD1 are primarily landing on Binance and Huobi (HDX). Staking protocols on the BNB chain like ListaDAO, Hong Kong's Plume Network actively laying out RWA, and projects like StakeStone are all strongly associated with Binance; heavyweight players with Chinese backgrounds, such as DWF Labs investing in Falcon Finance, Ankr founder Ryan Fang, and Paxos founder Rich Teo, are also deeply involved in the WLFI project. In other words, WLFI's global influence is being accelerated through the network of the Asian crypto community.

Interestingly, last week the CFTC announced the return of non-U.S. exchanges to the U.S. market, and these originally offshore giant exchanges may leverage this compliance window to re-enter the U.S. market. Whether it's Binance or OKX, if they can establish closer ties with the Trump family through this channel, they could gain advantages in compliance and legislative access, as well as in competition within the U.S. market.

Therefore, WLFI is not just a tool for the Trump family to "monetize influence," but also a strategic piece in building their global network of allies. It serves both current political capital and leaves a safe space for the business landscape after leaving office.

Why do trading platforms accept USD1 even if they earn less?

Why do so many crypto OGs support World Liberty Financial (WLFI)? We can glean some clues from rumors. For instance, there are speculations that CZ's support for Trump is partly motivated by a desire to potentially exchange for a "pardon" in the future; Sun Yuchen has also been asked similar questions in interviews: is this support some form of "political cash"? Regardless of the truth, for top offshore exchanges, this is indeed a lucrative deal—exchanging capital investment for political resources often yields higher returns than simple commercial investments.

On the other hand, Trump himself, like Musk, possesses an incredibly strong attention gravity, almost acting as a "traffic black hole." Whether it's the coins he issues, NFTs, or various public statements, they can instantly attract the world's attention. For exchanges, choosing to support such a project carries minimal risk: after all, with the backing of the Trump family, there is almost no concern that the project will rug pull or be hacked. Take the stablecoin USD1 as an example; this deal tied to Middle Eastern capital is a smart business move for Binance. Since the investor wants to invest money, it doesn't really matter which stablecoin is used, and using the Trump family's stablecoin incurs no additional costs while also winning goodwill from the Trump side.

A more pragmatic consideration is the potential of the U.S. market. In the next three years, the likelihood of giant exchanges like Binance and OKX returning to the U.S. market is far greater than returning to China. Getting closer to the Trump family means potentially gaining more convenience in compliance and legislative matters in the U.S. market. Although Coinbase is more cautious, it also expressed support at the first opportunity when Trump Coin launched. Each exchange will weigh the pros and cons of supporting the Trump family, but from both political and economic perspectives, it is indeed a worthwhile business.

As for Binance accepting nearly $2 billion in USD1 stablecoin, outsiders often ask: is this a good business? On the surface, it seems Binance has given up considerable profits. If this money were deposited in dollars or USDC, the interest income alone could reach $80 million to $100 million per year; USDC would also provide subsidies to distribution partners. However, accepting the nascent USD1 means these earnings are forfeited. Nevertheless, the benefits Binance may gain could be greater:

First, this is a compliant stablecoin, fully aligned with the U.S. regulatory framework for stablecoins, and could potentially be included in the mainstream alongside USDC and USDT. There are speculations that Binance may have a "back to back" agreement with the Trump family or Middle Eastern funds, such as profit-sharing on interest income or liquidity support subsidies, which means Binance has not truly lost as much revenue. Secondly, this money is primarily led by Middle Eastern funds, which may not be solely at Binance's discretion. Steven Witkoff, as the ambassador to the Middle East and co-founder of WLFI, could very well designate USD1 as the investment tool, and Binance would naturally have to accept it. The logic here is clear: this is the result of the binding of politics and capital, rather than a purely commercial choice. Thirdly, for Binance, USD1 itself is a strategic option. Since BUSD was "suffocated" by regulation, Binance has been lacking a stablecoin that is closely tied to itself and can land on a compliance level. Although FDUSD exists, its prospects are uncertain. In contrast, USD1 has the backing of the Trump family and a compliant identity in the U.S., and it may even become Binance's "default stablecoin" in the future. If successful, a closer strategic alliance will form between the two parties.

In other words, by having Middle Eastern consortiums invest in Binance, supporting WLFI and USD1, and thus gaining more support from Asian exchanges, WLFI has made a very correct decision. It positions OGs on the side of potential power and lays the groundwork for a possible return to the U.S. market in the future. In this regard, WLFI resembles a mutual selection between the Trump family and crypto OGs: Trump exchanges influence for capital and support, while exchanges bet on future political protection and market opportunities with their capital.

What is the relationship between WLFI and World Liberty Financial? How is its token model structured?

WLFI is the governance token of the World Liberty Financial protocol, but its design differs from typical governance tokens. Firstly, this token does not have a dividend function and cannot be mapped to equity in the underlying entity of the project, meaning that substantial decision-making power does not rest with the token holders. In other words, WLFI is more like a "pure governance token," but whether it truly plays a governance role remains questionable, as key decisions of the protocol are still made by the company itself rather than driven by on-chain governance processes.

In terms of token distribution, WLFI appears to be very centralized. Trump himself reportedly holds over 15% of the tokens, while Sun Yuchen, due to previous large purchases, occupies about 3% of the circulating supply. Additionally, a number of large whales have acquired significant amounts of tokens through on-chain and off-chain trading. Overall, WLFI sold approximately 30% of its tokens during the ICO, with the remaining 70% held by the project team. As for how these internal shares are distributed, the unlocking schedule, and whether they can be sold in the future, there is currently no public information available in the market, which creates significant uncertainty regarding WLFI's selling pressure outlook.

In terms of issuance design, WLFI also follows many "typical operations" of DeFi projects. For example, when the white paper was released in October 2024 and still in the presale stage, the tokens were set to be non-transferable, which is a common method to evade regulation in the U.S. market; similar practices have been seen in projects like EigenLayer, with lock-up periods often lasting up to a year. Now that WLFI is gradually meeting the conditions for transfer and launch, it is partly due to a clearer legislative environment in the U.S.; on the other hand, the change in SEC leadership and a friendlier regulatory attitude have also cleared obstacles for the token's circulation and listing.

From the perspective of token economic logic, WLFI, like many DeFi projects, has governance functions and supports on-chain voting and distribution mechanisms. Even during the non-transferable period, holders can still participate in governance voting. This arrangement is common in domestic projects in the U.S. and is seen as a protective design to alleviate regulatory pressure. However, whether WLFI can truly realize governance value or is merely a "politically haloed chip" remains a focal point of external attention.

What is the situation regarding the controversy over WLFI's token distribution with Aave? Do strong resources without innovation always win in the market?

In October of last year, WLFI proposed a narrative of "building a lending protocol based on Aave v3" and submitted a supporting proposal on WLFI's own and Aave's governance forums: firstly, 20% of the fee revenue generated by the WLFI protocol in the future was proposed to be allocated to the Aave DAO treasury; secondly, 7% of the total WLFI token supply (then based on a total of 10 billion tokens) would be donated to Aave for governance, liquidity incentives, or to promote the decentralization process.

On August 23 of this year, Aave's founder confirmed to the public that "the proposal is valid," but shortly after, WLFI team members publicly denied the authenticity of the "7% allocation." Domestic media further sought confirmation from the WLFI team and received a response of "fake news," which angered the Aave founder and led to a rapid decline in community sentiment. If roughly calculated based on the pre-market valuation at that time, the 7% allocation corresponded to a value in the "tens of billions of dollars," which was one of the direct causes of the strong emotions in the community.

In fact, the proposal at that time had only progressed to a "temperature check," which is fundamentally different from "binding governance." The former is mostly a textual expression of intent, and a vote of "approval" does not equate to having "binding executable code." Without contractual logic tied to the proposal, the governance outcome could be overturned by subsequent proposals at any time.

In other words, without on-chain executable terms, the so-called "approval" is closer to a non-binding memorandum of understanding (MOU), which is difficult to establish both legally and in terms of protocol realization. Typically, such project collaborations at the technical platform level (e.g., Spark and Aave) would not "give away" such a large proportion of tokens, so the "generosity" of the initial proposal deviated from industry norms, containing some "ambiguous" criteria for judgment. Before verifying Aave's substantial contribution to WLFI, promising a "fixed proportion" of the total token allocation and long-term revenue sharing is unusual.

Returning to that time, WLFI was still facing skepticism regarding "insufficient credibility and overvaluation" in Q4 2024, coupled with the founding team's previous project having a "history of being hacked," leading to unsatisfactory token sales. In this context, leveraging Aave's brand and security reputation to "legitimize" itself is an understandable public relations and market strategy. The combination of "Fork + revenue sharing/token transfer" alleviated the moral questioning of "copying," while also hedging against security concerns.

However, in the following months, WLFI rapidly gained traction and shifted its strategic focus to a DeFi hub centered around the USD1 stablecoin, with the original positioning of "core lending protocol" becoming secondary. After the narrative shift, the early "fixed proportion" static commitments naturally faced renegotiation: they were more likely to evolve into dynamic incentives linked to actual usage and contributions, or to allocate part of the tokens specifically for driving traffic in Aave-related markets.

Liu Feng referenced an interview from 2018 between Laura Shin and Multicoin founder Kyle Samani, where Kyle proposed the viewpoint that "in the crypto world, technology is not important; how to go to market and operate is what matters most." This viewpoint was questioned by many at the time, but looking back now, such occurrences are becoming increasingly frequent.

Can USD1 transition from "exchange-driven liquidity" to "real user usage"?

Firstly, the current general landscape for stablecoins is not optimistic. From a Crypto Native perspective, aside from a few top players (USDC, USDT), there is a lack of daily usage without yield stacking. Even with about $2 billion injected into USDE, it struggles to see natural retention. FDUSD is mostly used for strategic scenarios like trading new listings on exchanges and is rarely used otherwise, indicating that "building up scale" does not equate to "being needed by users."

In this reference frame, USD1 faces threefold hurdles: firstly, the dual-edged effect of political and banking channels. The political halo helps rapidly organize liquidity in offshore exchanges but may create resistance within the domestic financial system. Whether large U.S. banks are willing to provide friendly clearing and custody remains uncertain, and some jurisdictions and institutions may even avoid collaboration due to political sensitivities (e.g., individuals in Hong Kong choosing to avoid interactions due to Eric Trump's visit).

Secondly, there are real bottlenecks in channels and distribution. Currently, the main resources leveraged by USD1 are from offshore exchanges, while moving towards "real user usage" requires integrating with banks, payment systems, e-commerce, and embedded scenarios in social/super apps. These are slow variables that heavily rely on qualifications, risk control, and business negotiations; without them, stablecoins risk becoming mere "settlement chips between parties."

Thirdly, there are self-consistency requirements for products and incentives—crypto-native users generally dislike "organized narratives" and place greater importance on verifiable reliability and clear use cases. For USD1 to break through the strong inertia of USDT/USDC, it needs to establish stable expectations in areas such as reserve transparency/audit disclosure rhythm, multi-chain availability and bridging experience, wallet/custody native integration, merchant fee structures and rebate systems, and convenient redemptions in compliant regions. It must also convert early resource advantages into long-term incentives linked to "actual usage," rather than one-time market-making subsidies.

At the same time, WLFI's "resource pool" indeed possesses unique spillover value: by aligning the Trump family's vested interests with policy drivers, it is expected to pave the way for broader on-chain innovation. The first step of USD1 in "building on-chain liquidity" has already shown, but the key to transitioning from "passive liquidity" to "active usage" lies in whether it can continuously attract high-quality applications and achieve cross-domain distribution through existing ecological lists and appeal.

In the short term, it is difficult to shake the positions of USDT/USDC. More realistically, USD1 is currently acting as a universal settlement stablecoin among multiple parties, but it is relatively weak in terms of resources for banking entry/exit, payment/e-commerce/salary pilot progress, and mainstream wallet and custody default support. Coupled with marginal changes in the domestic political environment in the U.S., this is a double-edged sword that may not necessarily be a positive factor.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。