BIS Bulletin Proposes Revamping Crypto AML Measures With Compliance Scores

CN
1 hour ago

The expansion of cryptocurrency and stablecoins is prompting traditional finance institutions to implement new concepts to prevent their usage for illicit purposes. A new paper issued by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) economists proposes using blockchain to determine an anti-money laundering (AML) score for each crypto address, helping institutions deal with compliance concerns.

The bulletin, titled “An approach to anti-money laundering compliance for cryptoassets,” comments on the inefficiency of current methods to assess whether crypto funds are illicit or not, given their reliance on decentralized, undetermined operators, like validators or miners, to move these funds.

Economists call for using the same structure that makes cryptocurrency immune to traditional AML approaches for assessing the risk associated with dealing with a specific wallet address or transaction.

“As the full history of transactions on the blockchain is publicly available, it could inform an assessment of how closely a particular unit of a cryptoasset is associated with past or current illicit activity,” the bulletin highlights.

The referred AML score could be issued regarding this transaction history. The AML score would be generated on a 0 to 100 point scale, with addresses holding 100 points being the cleanest and 0 being the riskiest. This would help banking platforms used as off-ramps (points where crypto is exchanged into fiat) assess whether they should complete the requested transactions or refuse interaction with a flagged address.

The paper explained:

Crypto exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and banks could apply safeguards by considering minimum AML compliance score requirements for cashing out crypto coins, helping to prevent funds from illicit activities from entering the conventional monetary system

Different institutions would have differing tolerances for higher-risk addresses depending on their operational principles, jurisdiction, and regulatory frameworks. For example, a store selling gift cards would have a higher tolerance than a bank offering investment options in crypto.

Read more: BIS Study Shows Low-Value Bitcoin Transfers Reshape Remittances Amid High Traditional Costs

Read more: BIS Drops Mbridge Project Participation: It Was ‘Not Created to Serve the BRICS’

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

限时狂撒18万U,注册即享1500U福利!
Ad
Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink