A wallet that had been dormant for 15 years was embroiled in a $260 billion lawsuit, and then it took action first. 75 BTC, untouched since 2011, were transferred out. At $67,181 per BTC, this is approximately $5.04 million, a drop in the ocean compared to $260 billion, but for an address that had remained silent for 15 years, it was a resounding response. Background: This wallet had been lying dormant since 2011, completely inactive, until it was named and implicated in this lawsuit. The timeline is clear—first, it lay dormant for 15 years; then it was named; then, 75 BTC were transferred out. On the surface, $5.04 million is indeed insignificant compared to $260 billion, but its symbolic meaning far outweighs the amount. On one hand, there's a $260 billion lawsuit; on the other, a $5.04 million transfer—the magnitudes are vast, but the signal is resounding. My opinion: Dormant coins are not necessarily lost coins. The fact that the previously mentioned older wallets are starting to reactivate indicates that early holders still have owners. If more older coins follow suit, BTC will have to absorb more than just the $2.35 billion outflow from ETFs over two weeks. The turning point is that the market has historically viewed these older addresses as "perpetually unmoving" supply. Once this assumption is broken, the pricing logic must change. Do you think this is a response to the lawsuit, or simply a change of address? Other key points for today are shown in the image above ⚠️ Not investment advice · DYOR Crypto Evening News Bitcoin On-chain Data