Beyond conspiracy theories, this wave of "ousting Huang" (referring to a former Republican Party member) represents a convergence of multiple forces: White House national security and foreign policy officials, hardliners on China from both parties in Congress, and some American model companies were all pushing for policies they already supported. Media reports amplified the focus and increased external pressure, ultimately leading to the board's decision on Huang's appointment. These forces share common interests but also have significant differences. While they cannot be said to have orchestrated a unified plan, their efforts from different angles created a combined force to oust Huang. The hardliners on China within the Republican Party were a significant force exerting pressure, with the Democrats also actively involved. Some Silicon Valley companies pushed for stricter export restrictions. It can only be said that shared policy goals allowed people from different factions and parties to work together on the same issue. The Republican Party's comprehensive defeat in the midterm elections dealt a significant blow to Trump's influence and authority. Despite Trump's repeated statements of support, he could not stem the combined pressure from hardliners within his own party, the Democrats, and public opinion, ultimately failing to retain Huang. It was precisely this setback that gave hardliners in the Republican Party and the Democrats an opening, allowing them to exploit Huang's personal relationship to escalate the situation. They themselves knew that Huang's departure would have a significant impact on Nvidia and the overall US AI industry, but they were still willing to pay that price. Two things may change: 1) The US side advocating for preserving the Chinese AI market has lost a difficult-to-replace representative; 2) The businessman-style US diplomacy led by Trump in 2025-2026, focused on economic interests, will subsequently return to prioritizing national interests.