To be honest, the most outrageous way I've seen a crypto team unlock tokens is by "issuing tokens as soon as the calendar flips." The product hasn't even launched, and the tokens are already unlocked. @NeoSoulAI's Believe statement this time is quite harsh: The lock-up period will be maintained, but not automatically unlocked linearly over time. Each period must first meet KPIs, and the unlocked amount cannot exceed the original linear amount; If it doesn't meet KPIs, none will be unlocked for that period. Which KPIs should they focus on? They're writing about real revenue, retention, and things that can be verified on-chain, and they even let the community decide, instead of self-evaluating. I've heard the talk about a century-old project and using DNA as the agent's economic accounting unit—let's treat it as a vision for now. Whether they can control the team depends on their attitude tonight. We'll see what happens next: Will the performance evaluation be strictly enforced? Who will verify it? If it fails verification, will there truly be zero unlocks? How long will the lock-up last? How often will the evaluation be conducted? What happens to the unqualified tokens? The official account hasn't revealed anything yet, so don't speculate. Today's public commitment to verification is essentially handing over the power to set the criteria to the community. Stop with the formalities. Just ask how revenue is calculated, which retention metrics to monitor, and who makes the final decisions on KPIs. @NeoSoulAI NeoSoul