[Meta's Automated Content Moderation System Accused of Repeatedly Blocking Political Accounts During US and Brazilian Elections, Leading to Multiple Accountability Actions] According to a report by Fortune on November 4th, Meta is accelerating the replacement of human content moderation with large language models. As of June, these models had processed approximately half of all moderation requests, and the company plans to automate over 90% of some violation categories by the end of the year. Meta claims its model makes 13% fewer errors and detects 10% more violations than human moderators. In recent weeks, its automated system has repeatedly mistakenly blocked or banned political accounts during the Brazilian and US elections, sparking allegations of election interference. In Brazil, Lula's campaign filed a complaint with the Supreme Electoral Court on October 10th, alleging that Meta restricted the dissemination of its accounts and mistranslated negative comments about opponents as supportive content. The court ordered Meta to treat both candidates equally and imposed a daily fine of 500,000 reais (approximately US$98,000). Lula ultimately won the October 25 runoff election with 51.8% of the vote. Whether Meta will be fined is still undecided, but prosecutors filed a civil lawsuit on October 21. In the United States, on October 17, the No Kings movement's Instagram account was suspended for approximately 90 minutes. Meta stated that the reason was that the organization used the Claude tool to frequently read content, triggering automatic security measures. On October 27, the Spanish-language account of Florida Democratic Senate candidate Angie Nixon was mistakenly flagged as impersonation and was reinstated the following day. Meta attributed these incidents to technical errors and has apologized. Its oversight committee criticized the repeated errors in election enforcement but did not determine that the incidents were politically motivated. Attorneys general from 13 states and the District of Columbia, as well as members of Congress, have demanded an explanation from Meta, but these demands are not legally binding.