When politics gets involved, many people only look at stances, not viewpoints and frameworks. This tweet started by using prediction market data to say that a Democratic sweep in the midterm elections is highly probable, while a Republican retention of the Senate is unlikely, which sparked a lot of dissatisfaction. Many said that polls and prediction markets were part of a left-wing conspiracy. Whether it's a conspiracy or not, I'm not that concerned. Even last week, this link (https://(x.com)/qinbafrank/status/2113089295066300713?s=46&t=k6rimWsEbo2D2tXolYcM-A) used the 2022 midterm elections as an example to argue that the current strong blue wave doesn't necessarily mean a Democratic sweep. But did anyone actually read this tweet? The tweet only used prediction market data to illustrate two scenarios, but the key content wasn't about who wins. It was about how the different congressional power structures under these two scenarios—a Democratic sweep and a Republican retention of the Senate—differ in their impact on AI, crypto industry policy, fiscal spending, and the market. More importantly, the tweet emphasizes that from a market perspective, the midterm elections "may be more important than the outcome!" For investors, which side wins the election isn't important. What's important is understanding the different impacts of different scenarios, what policy trends will emerge under different results, and what the market's impact will be. And based on this, develop some contingency plans in advance. As for who wins, that's not the focus of this tweet at all, but it seems many people only read the beginning and not the whole thing.