Why do you see others making money, yet you always seem to be paying tuition fees as soon as you enter the market? Because those who lose everything usually don't post screenshots of their profits every day. Scrolling through timelines: some people have 100x returns, some have turned small capital into wealth, some have perfectly timed market tops. Seeing so much of this, it's easy to think that making money is the norm, and that you're the only one who's missing the boat. But what you see are only those willing to showcase their success, those pushed to the forefront by the platform. Those who deleted their accounts after being liquidated, those who fell silent after losses, those who started new accounts and told their stories again—these are rarely seen in your sample. This is survivorship bias. Suppose 10,000 people simultaneously heavily invest in different altcoins. Some will inevitably experience a surge. Afterwards, listening to their post-trade analysis, from the narrative to the entry point, they can explain every step clearly. But looking only at the winners, we can't determine whether their methods were effective, or whether after enough people take risks, a few lucky ones will remain. Even more insidious is that the winners' experience may not be replicable. They may have low-cost capital and other assets to back them up, while you, with your living expenses, are copying their most risky move. So when you see stories of overnight riches, don't rush to ask what they bought. First, ask: How many people have used similar methods? Where did those who failed go? How much drawdown did this profit withstand, and how many times can it be repeated? Remember: A person making money through a certain method only proves that it was successful in the past; only by including those who failed can you truly understand how difficult the path is.