In fact, when using AI, it's crucial to understand the primary function of each AI. In my experience, Grok's biggest advantage is its integration with X. Aside from that, its actual data coordination, logic, and even computational accuracy aren't as good as ChatGPT. Unfortunately, neither ChatGPT nor Claude can fully read X's data, so Grok's primary task should be reading X's information. Previously, I developed software where ChatGPT wrote the code and Claude reviewed it. The back-and-forth was fairly even, and the collaboration went quite well. However, with CodeX, although the token usage has increased significantly, I personally feel that CodeX is more stable than Claude in terms of development. Claude's biggest advantage is its meticulousness. When I was writing the design, some details were overlooked, and Claude was able to point them out and make judgments. Therefore, I see Claude's work more as review and correction. So my order was to have ChatGPT analyze and break down the work I needed to do. If it involved X-related content, Grok had the highest priority; if it was purely internet content, ChatGPT had the highest priority. All content had to be checked by Claude before being presented to me. Regarding the credit limit, I'm using the highest limit on ChatGPT, which is also the most expensive and is already maxed out. Claude is on a $30/month plan, and Grok is on X's Premium plan. For now, it seems sufficient. If I want to increase its power, I'll upgrade Claude to the Max version, which can use Fabric 5.1. Personally, I think if it's not used for video production, Grok's Premium plan is enough. A @Gate account, trading more markets.