I've been using Grok @bot and @Muse extensively for a few weeks now, and here's a review: 1. The most impressive feature of Grok @bot is its multi-device login capability. I haven't seen many people mention this. It can simultaneously log in to Mac, Linux, iOS, and Windows, and can even control other logged-in systems from iOS. This is something Lobster and Hermes can't do. 2. I'm currently using Grok @bot to automatically create accounts on social media platforms. From topic selection, video generation, publishing, and automatic commenting, it's a seamless process, working diligently like a dedicated employee every day, consistently reaching 200u subscriptions. 3. Many people worry about AI-generated accounts being banned. I connected several phones to a Linux DGX server, allowing Grok @bot to control Android phones via ADB. All operations—uploading, publishing, and commenting—are completed on the phones. The entire process is distilled into skills, and other tasks are reused. 4. Muse is essentially free, and it even comes with a free KVM machine, roughly equivalent to 300 RMB per month, and one billion tokens reset weekly for free. Muse's advantage is that it's free, which alone puts it far ahead of other similar products on the market. 5. Muse is slightly lacking in engineering-related coding tasks. For example, asking it to choose a topic and edit a video requires an external API; otherwise, it feels like a dead end. The remote control experience is not as good as Grok Bot, and it's on par with GPT's Dot. 6. The machines they provide don't have external ports. You need to run a local service to access the internet. The best practice is to have a persistent process using a CF tunnel. Other solutions are inferior to this, which also supports SSH over CF. The advantages of static IPs are not elaborated here. 7. The most convenient usage is to install Claude CLI and CodeX CLI on both the bot and Muse, allowing the bot to control them. This is especially useful for video replication; you can find interesting videos online and have the bot disassemble, replicate, review, and then publish them. 8. Aside from being free, I haven't found any other aspects of Muse that offer a better user experience than Grok bots. Muse is essentially a low-spec bot, which I suspect is due to a combination of KVM configuration and the intelligence of its model. Perhaps Muse's better compatibility with US applications is an advantage I haven't yet discovered. 9. Muse currently doesn't support cross-platform operation, and its local execution permissions are relatively low; high-level permissions are all hosted on its remote servers. Muse can handle some simple daily tasks, but for engineering, code, cross-platform high-privilege collaboration, and multi-device hybrid collaboration, bots are currently the most capable, bar none. 10. Regarding trading, bots are quite suitable for market monitoring and strategy execution, but strategy customization still relies on humans. Investing and trading are more like abstract philosophy and art; AI can only solve engineering problems, not artistic aesthetics. The quality of a strategy is inherently a matter of subjective aesthetics. Many people give Grok bots 100u (presumably referring to a specific amount of software or resource) to make money, which is like giving AI a hundred images and asking it to pick the beautiful ones—only beautiful images are allowed, no ugly ones. 11. My current best practice setup is Paseo + Grok bot + Claude CLI + Codex CLI, which is arguably the most comfortable state for OPC. I can use Vibe and manage operations anytime on my phone, and my computer synchronizes context across all platforms. Humans are constantly generating context while alive.