This is great! When it comes to naming, it’s basically the same logic as domain names, but the underlying foundation here is AI. I think this direction is definitely worth exploring. When I usually do trading research, I often have random ideas pop into my head, like $BTC dollar-cost averaging or entering the market only under specific conditions. But turning those ideas into a clear set of executable rules takes quite a bit of time. This time, I want to try something new—just use everyday language to tell AI my trading strategy and see if it can generate a corresponding strategy canvas. Then, I’ll gradually review and tweak the logic within. For people who don’t know how to code, this approach is definitely worth exploring. At the very least, it lowers the barrier to trying out automated strategies. That said, what I care about more isn’t whether AI can quickly generate a strategy, but whether the output aligns with my expectations, whether there are any loopholes in the rules, and how it performs under different market conditions. So I’ll start with simulated trading first, observe the process, and then decide what needs adjusting. AI can help us bring ideas to life, but it can’t take on the trading risks for us. Just because the code passes checks doesn’t mean the strategy is effective, and it definitely doesn’t guarantee profits. Tools are here to improve efficiency, but the final judgment still has to come from us. If you’re interested, you can try picking a simple trading idea yourself—start with simulations, then consider the next steps. Register early, claim your spot!