THORChain is a typical example of carrying the red flag against the red flag, using decentralized technology as an innocent shield to help hackers launder billions of dollars and earn their own transaction fees. If anyone uses the spirit of password manipulation to defend THORChain, it is either bad or stupid. From Bybit to KelpDAO to this Bitget, hackers all use THORChain for money laundering without exception, THORChain is highly favored by hackers due to its unique operating mechanism compared to other cross chain bridges. Most cross chain bridges transfer the mapping of the same type of asset between different chains, that is, packaging tokens, such as BTC in the Bitcoin network and wBTC in the Ethereum network. THORChain, on the other hand, uses a liquidity pool to exchange one native token for another, using its own RUNE token as a transfer to pair with other tokens. For example, after I transfer 10 ETH into THORChain, THORChain will first exchange ETH for RUNE, then use RUNE to exchange BTC, and finally directly transfer the native BTC to your address, thus realizing the direct transfer of funds from ETH to RUNE. ETH jumping to BTC, the transaction history of the two chains is incompatible and untraceable, and there is no need for KYC, making it the first choice for hackers to launder money. After every hacking incident, THORChain claims to be decentralized and permissionless like Bitcoin and Ethereum, so he should not be held responsible. But is this really the case? THORChain's rhetoric is completely insulting to Bitcoin and Ethereum. Currently, THORChain has only 99 nodes, and one person can operate multiple nodes. Moreover, THORChain's governance mechanism encourages such "witch" behavior because voting is not based on staking weight, but on the number of nodes. Therefore, operators have a great motivation to split into multiple nodes. According to historical behavior collection, less than half of THORChain's true independent operators are. Secondly, although THORChain is decentralized in protocol, it is not impossible to refuse or freeze transactions in practical operation. THORChain itself has a built-in mechanism called Mimir, which enables manual intervention to stop transactions in emergency situations. At least three nodes need to agree to execute, but there is a game mechanism here. If four other nodes do not agree, the execution can be overturned, and then five more nodes agree to continue, and so on. At this moment, you, who are innocent and lovely, will definitely jump out to protect the master and say, 'Look, even if they have a pause mechanism, it still needs to be done through decentralized negotiation.'. I'm fucking your mom! How could you say such shameless words In May of this year, a malicious node infiltrated THORChain and used a signature vulnerability to withdraw $10.7 million from the vault for 9 chains, which means THORChain was hacked into the pool. Bybit and Bitget are often stolen for over a billion yuan, while THORChain's powerful nodes lick their faces and shamelessly say that we must enforce the law impartially to uphold the sacred dignity of decentralization! Then he happily put the huge handling fee into his pocket. But this time it was his turn to steal a mere 10 million, so THORChain's face was "Freeze! Freeze me now The payment mechanism of THORChain automatically applied the brakes and suspended transaction signatures within a few minutes. Secondly, the nodes immediately coordinated in Discord and manually suspended the transactions of these chains, resulting in a complete shutdown. Then the developer immediately released a patch, requiring all nodes to upgrade. After being shut down for over a month, trading gradually resumed. No, why are these password attackers so double labeled When others were robbed of billions, they watched coldly, and when they were robbed of 10 million, they were shut down for a month. That's amazing