Some people are saying that after last night's Bitget hack, it proves that CEXs are very dangerous, so everyone should move their assets to DEXs. I think this logic is pretty ridiculous. No matter what, CEXs at least have a whole professional wallet security system in place: cold and hot wallet separation, multi-signature, permission management, risk control monitoring, abnormal transaction interception, and dedicated security teams. With hackers and AI attack methods becoming more advanced, no system can ever be 100% foolproof. The real comparison shouldn't be about whether "CEXs can be hacked" but rather: When facing the same attack, is an average person managing their own private keys and wallet really safer than a large CEX? Using a DEX doesn’t automatically mean your assets are "decentralized and safe." Private key leaks, phishing sites, malicious approvals, fake wallets, clipboard attacks, signing the wrong contract, losing your seed phrase... just one misstep, and your money is gone. And most likely, you won’t even know who to hold accountable. If a CEX has an issue, at least there’s a platform entity, a security team, a risk control system, and possibly even compensation mechanisms. But if your personal wallet has an issue? You’re your own customer service, risk control, security team, and the one ultimately responsible. So seeing one CEX security incident and concluding that "CEXs are dangerous, everyone should use DEXs"—I honestly don’t get it. The risk hasn’t disappeared; it’s just been shifted from the exchange to an average user whose security capabilities are far inferior to those of the exchange. To put it bluntly: What kind of dumb logic is this?