There are no dead tracks, only forms of failure. The earliest prediction market was not called Polymarket, but Augur, which already existed in 2015. If we only look at the design, it and Polymarket are almost two different creatures. The same script also happened to DEX. The first DEX on Ethereum was not Uniswap, but EtherDelta. As an on chain order book, EtherDelta requires users to place and take orders on their own, making the experience extremely cumbersome. The outcome of failure was written from the beginning. So in Crypto, the stalling of the track is often not due to wrong demand, but to wrong form. All the attempts we have failed in the past, such as NFT, GameFi, SocialFi, will come back in a different form at some unexpected moment. For example, this year's hottest FOMO is essentially a variant of SocialFi. But SocialFi's imagination goes far beyond that. Previously, SocialFi did one thing wrong In the past, SocialFi almost made the same mistake of treating socializing as a product and transactions as an additional feature. Either force a wallet into a social platform, or add a comment section to a trading platform. @The design of MinddotWTF is completely different, social itself is the market structure. Its core rules are only four: Post to buy you http://MIND.WTF Just post a word with a $, such as AI, and the system will use the funds in your wallet to automatically buy an AI token. But this is not a paid posting. The principal you invest will buy tokens along the keyword curve. You can continue to hold or sell and exit at any time. To express one's opinion, one must bet with real money. One word is a market A keyword corresponds to only one market. Why is this important? Because the traditional Memecoin platform has a fatal flaw, named Fragmentation. When a narrative goes viral, more than ten tokens with the same name will emerge. After the heat receded, liquidity and community scattered among different tokens. http://MIND.WTF Use uniqueness to solve problems. Whether there are ten or a hundred thousand posts under a word, there is only one market. Unlimited content, concentrated assets. The narrative is constantly changing, and the common coordinates permanently exist. Holding coins means voting The rules are simple: The voting direction is determined by your wallet signature Voting weight is determined by the number of keyword tokens you hold Each keyword is an independent governance unit If you hold AI, you can only give support or opposition to the content of the AI community; If you hold DOGE, you won't be able to manage AI matters. Only those who truly care about this community and contribute to it can decide what content is seen. Trading is like a wave The first three rules have made each keyword operate like an independent small country. http://MIND.WTF What's even more special is to keep these independent markets connected. The platform has designed a public space called 'RGB layer'. When you buy a keyword, it not only drives the price of the keyword itself, but also drives the entire platform up. At the same time, users can also receive two additional layers of benefits. First layer: Purchase limit cycle Its operation mode is: You completed the purchase with a purchase limit of 1 SOL The system will issue you 2 new invitation codes Each invitation code corresponds to a purchase qualification of 1 SOL After a friend uses your invitation code to purchase 1 SOL, you will restore the purchase limit of 1 SOL The restored quota can be used again and new invitation codes can continue to be generated The purchase limit is not a SOL given by the platform, but a buying qualification. Every time a purchase is made, the user still needs to pay with real funds. Second layer: Fee sharing The user you invited will receive 80% of the transaction fee directly from you every time they complete a purchase through posting. These profits will be automatically settled upon each purchase and do not require manual collection. 2/ SocialFi， Evolved to 3.0 If SocialFi is roughly divided into three generations, the logic will be very clear. 1.0 Creator Economy, represented by Rally. The core is to help creators monetize. 2.0 Decentralized Social Graph, represented by Lens and Farcaster. The core is to return relationships and data to users. 3.0 Attention is the market, representing http://MIND.WTF The core is to unify posting, trading, and governance into one action. Take it and http://Friend.tech By comparison, the difference becomes even more apparent. http://Friend.tech The logic is that I paid to purchase your access rights and enter a private chat room. Social content and trading assets are separated. http://MIND.WTF The logic is that a keyword is an attention market. You must post your views on the narrative and invest capital in it. 3/A high difficulty experiment http://MIND.WTF Completely abandoning the traditional social square model, attempting to unify social expression, transactions, and community governance with an atomic action. Its advantage is that the design is highly imaginative, but the mechanism is relatively complex. As a highly experimental design, its success can only be tested by time. Official website- https://mind.wtf Here are a few invitation codes for everyone: wtf-pVTkyfR0Jt wtf-yNR53hZc1L wtf-bL9UhwKEBP wtf-g4IK3aOVYw wtf-yyIWDlPQvn wtf-xJGbTXDjTy wtf-FKUgKE3WbC wtf-urWsrPtpQ5 wtf-sdMbC1cPxA wtf-ShrbiVvA8y DYOR