帕尔 | 無極Infinity®|Sep 10, 2026 08:24
Bored and idle, let's discuss a problem together.
I think the most interesting thing about BTC's current position is not whether it is rising or falling, but rather a clear contradiction.
Since August 19th, when Besent released signals related to the Ministry of Finance's repurchase, BTC has been held for three consecutive days and has returned to the 80k range. But after that, BTC fluctuated around 80k for more than 20 days. Continuous testing has been conducted at a height of 82.8k above, but there has been no real breakthrough, and even a triple top smell has begun to appear on the graph.
At the same time, several alarming phenomena have emerged within the market.
one ️⃣ Meme's emotions return to frenzy
The recent Me me craze brought by Rainhood has clearly drained some of the on-site liquidity.
This stage reminds me of the Meme frenzy brought about by Trump's cryptocurrency issuance around 120000 BTC.
I'm not saying: Meme's popularity equals BTC's peak.
But this phenomenon often indicates that market risk appetite has begun to spread from BTC/mainstream assets to high Beta/Meme/extreme speculation.
If BTC itself cannot break through the previous high at this time, it is worth being vigilant.
two ️⃣ ETF marginal buying volume begins to weaken
At present, we have not seen a continuous and systematic withdrawal of institutional funds, but the marginal incremental funds are not as strong as before.
That is to say, the sell orders did not completely crush BTC, and the buy orders were not strong enough to break through 82.8k.
So the problem arose.
The current macro environment is actually not friendly: Oil>100
US10Y ≈ 4.8% 。
The Ministry of Finance's repurchase of 6 billion yuan of long-term bonds has not truly lowered the yield according to traditional risk on logic. In this environment, BTC should theoretically bear greater pressure.
But the reality is: BTC is still holding around 78k, so what exactly is this? Strong or the final passivation before a sharp decline?
I think there are two explanations now.
① There is so much really strong bad news, and BTC still cannot fall, indicating that there is indeed a continuation below.
If the macro situation slightly improves in the future: 10Y ↓/Oil ↓/CPI tends to cool down, BTC is likely to experience a rapid upward squeeze due to its previous long-term "stagnant" trend.
In this case, once 828 truly breaks through and stabilizes, the triple top logic is basically ineffective.
② Another more dangerous possibility of top passivation is that bad news cannot fall, and good news cannot rise either.
The price has remained high and looks strong, but before each shock, the high is sold off. This state is actually quite similar: high stakes chips are slowly changing hands.
So now I won't go short just because I see the triple top, nor will I assume that BTC is necessarily strong just because it's resistant to decline. For me, the key is still two positions: 828=confirmation from multiple positions
762=short confirmation, there are fluctuations in the middle here.
The real key question is: Can BTC still rise after the next macroeconomic favorable event?
If CPI is cold and 10Y falls, and BTC still cannot break through 828, then I will start to show a clear tendency: this is not a strong trend, but a top passivation.
On the other hand, if the bad news has already been digested and a slight positive news directly breaks through 828, then the current month's volatility may not be at the top at all, but rather building momentum for the next upward trend.
So: Level gifts location. Reaction gifts entry.
Share To
Timeline
HotFlash
APP
X
Telegram
CopyLink