Another launch platform has arrived on Solana. However, coin and stock launch platforms are no longer uncommon. What is truly worth watching is what the team behind it did first and how it went from Robinhood Chain to Solana. Go over the timeline and everyone will understand. Step 1: Develop AI products first @The earliest version of emberbuild was Ember Studio. This is a platform that uses AI to generate websites, bots, and agents. Users input their requirements, and the system helps you build pages, deploy applications, generate robots, and even supplement the basic tools needed for project operation. Simply put, it is to quickly package an on chain project that only has a name and avatar into a complete project that looks like it has an official website, products, and robots. Although the team did not publicly disclose their real names, this brand has been operating continuously since around May this year, not just registering an account yesterday or making a temporary launch disk today. Step 2: Release the first EMBER on Robinhood Chain With the rise of Robinhood Chain and cryptocurrency narrative, the team moved Ember Studio to the Robinhood ecosystem and issued the first EMBER: 0x139ea209A647FD1f8BF275b982D3DBAD3e4B1A4D This coin corresponds to the AI Studio product. After going online, the highest market value reached approximately 2.1 million to 2.6 million US dollars, and then rapidly cooled down. As of around September 10th, the market value has fallen to approximately $750000, with only about $20000 left in daily transactions. It cannot be said to be completely dead, but it is clear that there is no sustained market consensus. Products are made by people, stories are told by people, but the market is unwilling to give more money. Sometimes on the chain, it's just that realistic. You've been writing code for three months, it's better for someone else to pull a three hour drive. Step 3: Switch to Solana and launch EmberCurve After the first shot on Robinhood Chain did not hit scale, the team quickly aimed the second shot at Solana. Around September 9th, they launched EmberCurve: A permissionless launch platform based on Meteora DBC. Simultaneously release the second EMBER with the same name: 5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6 This coin corresponds to EmberCurve on Solana, not Ember Studio on Robinhood Chain. Although the two coins share the same brand account, Telegram, and operational portal, they belong to independent contracts on different chains and currently have no public exchange relationship. The first one on Robinhood ran for a week and is still under a million dollars. The second one on Solana achieved a market value and transaction of millions of dollars within a few hours of its launch. The team has proven one thing through practical actions: AI can generate products. Solana is responsible for generating liquidity. Step 4: Connect the original AI product with the launch platform The really interesting thing about EmberCurve is not that it has created another launch platform. But it is trying to form a closed loop with the original Ember Studio. Ember Studio is responsible for the first half: Generate brand, website, bot, agent, and project content. EmberCurve is responsible for the second half: Issuing tokens, establishing curves, accumulating liquidity, and completing graduation. That is to say, users can first use AI to create a project and then directly launch it onto Solana in the future. From a prompt word to the official website, robot, token, and liquidity, try to complete them within the same system as much as possible. Previously, when posting Meme, it was necessary to find artists, front-end developers, robot developers, and launch platforms. Now Ember wants to tell you: Don't even look, just talk to AI. As for whether the final product is a project or a flow chart, it depends on whether the person using AI has a conscience. The first highlight of EmberCurve is its support for stock tokens as a bottom pool Traditional Solana launch platforms mostly use SOL or USDC as quoted assets. EmberCurve supports over 144 tokenized stocks in addition to SOL and USDC, such as NVDAx, AAPLx, TSLAx, MSTRx, and SPYx. The creator can directly issue a Meme paired with stock tokens. For example, if NVDAx is used as a quoted asset, the NVDAx brought by buying will enter the curve; After reaching the threshold, enter the Meteora DAMM v2 pool together with the project token. This does not mean that Meme holders own Nvidia stock. Essentially, it just transforms stock tokens from trading targets to Meme's valuation assets and liquidity reserves. StonkFun has already walked this path, so 'coin stock launch' is not Ember's original creation. The difference of Ember is that it is integrated into the Meteora system and bundled with AI project generation tools. The second highlight is that the handling fees can be freely combined The platform allows creators to set a transaction tax of approximately 1% to 3%, of which approximately 80% can be allocated to different modules: Give rewards to the holders. Automatic repurchase and destruction. Create SuperLotto lottery. Or enter the team wallet. These modules claim to automatically execute on the chain every 15 minutes. A portion of the remaining platform revenue is planned to be used for repurchasing and destroying EMBER on Solana. The focus of this mechanism is not on the amount of transaction fees, but on the creator being able to design the project's profit structure themselves. If you want to make a dividend plan, you can distribute rewards. If you want to talk about deflation, you can repurchase and destroy it. If you want popularity, you can keep drawing lots. If you want to harvest, you can also transfer the money into the team wallet and write the module name as' Long term Ecological Fund '. The tool is neutral. People who use tools are usually not. So looking at the entire team's path together, Ember's actions are actually very clear: First, use AI to help the project complete product packaging. Use the launch platform to complete asset issuance. Add narrative with stock tokens. Maintain operations using the transaction fee module. Finally, attempt to repurchase EMBER using platform revenue. This is a closed loop of "AI production project, launch platform production assets, and fee maintenance story". The most commendable aspect of this team is their fast pace of product iteration and market chasing. Robinhood Chain failed to catch the first EMBER, and instead of continuing to tell stories in place, they quickly turned to Solana to upgrade their original AI product into a launch tool. But the biggest problem is equally evident: The same brand, two chains, two coins with the same name, the value relationship is not clearly explained. Will Studio users on Robinhood really come to Solana to issue coins? Will the revenue generated by EmberCurve continue to repurchase EMBER on Solana? What role will the Robinhood EMBER play in the future? There are currently no complete answers to these questions. So EmberCurve has now proven three things: The team has indeed produced products. The launch platform can indeed operate. Solana's market response is also significantly better than Robinhood Chain. But it has not yet proven the most important thing: Can we use Ember Studio to continuously manufacture projects, and then use EmberCurve to continuously manufacture high market value assets. If both sides truly form a user and revenue loop, Ember will not just be another launch platform. If no one uses Studio in the end and Curve is left with only a running chart, with each EMBER telling its own story, then this cross chain upgrade may just be the team starting a new round for themselves.