Someone once told me: 'SUI's founder is always out partying, hitting up bars, hooking up—if the team’s founder is like this, can the project even succeed?' Back then, I actually let this comment influence me. I sold SUI at around 0.5, and then watched it climb all the way up. Later, I realized my biggest mistake wasn’t selling too early—it was using rumors about someone’s personal life to judge the investment value of a project. If a founder drinks, parties, dates, or even has a colorful personal life after work, as long as it’s not illegal, doesn’t affect their job, and doesn’t harm the project or investors, it has absolutely nothing to do with whether the project will succeed. Ancient emperors had harems, and modern business tycoons aren’t exactly proving their abilities through asceticism. Men liking beautiful women, women liking handsome men—that’s just basic human nature. In fact, if you think about it, having desires isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Desire itself is often the original driving force behind making money, starting businesses, and climbing the ladder. What we should really focus on is: Does the founder have the ability? Can the team execute? Is the product being used? Is the ecosystem growing? Can money and resources keep flowing in? Not what time the founder gets home or who they’re hanging out with. One of the most expensive lessons in crypto is: Using moral puritanism to make investment decisions, or replacing fundamentals with gossip. A project won’t pump just because the founder is a 'good guy,' nor will it dump just because he likes going to bars. The market only cares about results. So now, when someone tells me: 'This founder is a player, the project is doomed.' My first reaction isn’t to sell anymore. It’s— Who cares? Show me the on-chain data and valuation first.