Not only have I thought about this, but I even ran a test—did about two episodes. The response was pretty good, but the biggest issue is that since it’s pre-recorded, by the time it’s ready, it’s already outdated. From filming to editing, plus coordinating with guests’ schedules, it takes about a week. The crypto world moves way too fast—within a week, the hot topics have already changed four or five times. The alternative is live streaming. While it’s more timely, the biggest problem with live streaming is that you can’t speak freely. Back when we were testing, we’d gossip like crazy—true or false, we’d say it all—because we could always edit it out later. But if it’s all live, there’s zero room for error. One wrong word and you might offend someone, so it ends up feeling very restrictive. Another issue is that “roasting” isn’t something you can guarantee will happen every day, so there’s a level of unpredictability. Plus, if sponsors get involved, there are a lot of topics you can’t touch. Honestly, all of these issues can be solved, but the biggest question is: why do this in the first place? What’s the benefit? When we stopped doing it before, this was one of the reasons. From the audience’s perspective, it’s definitely entertaining to watch, but the person talking is very likely to offend people. And you have to remember, one of the defining features of the crypto world is that many people don’t want to show their faces, which makes it even harder. So it’s not that it’s a bad idea or that there’s no demand—it’s just that the people who could do it aren’t interested, and the people who are interested can’t find the right resources. That’s where it stands. I was just chatting with some friends about this a couple of days ago, but we still haven’t figured out a good breakthrough.