[White House Crypto Advisor Says Democrats' Objections to CLARITY Act Ethics Provisions Are 'Unfounded'] Odaily Planet Daily News: White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt posted on the X platform, stating that the Democratic Party's objections to the ethics provisions in the CLARITY Act seem to fall into two main categories: (1) If the ethics provisions cannot be enforced by state attorneys general, then they are meaningless; (2) If the ethics provisions do not hold President Trump accountable for his previous involvement in crypto-related activities, then these provisions are unacceptable. Patrick Witt argued that if you support viewpoint (1), then you are essentially claiming that all existing federal ethics laws are meaningless, as none of these laws can currently be enforced by state attorneys general. If you support viewpoint (2), then no measure could satisfy your demands, as the approach you advocate clearly violates the Constitution (see Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution).