Comparison of rToken and bStock US Stock Trading Modes in One Picture At present, there are two main models of US stock assets on cryptocurrency exchanges: rToken and bStock. Both allow users to participate in US stock price fluctuations through stablecoins such as USDT, but the actual trading experience is not the same. On the surface, the difference in bid ask spread between rToken and bStock may not be significant. On some of the targets, bStock's quotation even seems tighter. So if it's just a small transaction within a few hundred dollars, users may not feel a significant difference. But what really affects the trading experience is not just the price difference between buying and selling, but also the depth of trading and the carrying capacity of transactions. The liquidity of bStock mainly relies on market makers, and the depth of trading is generally thin. Once the user places a slightly larger order amount, it is easy to break through multiple price ranges, resulting in actual transaction prices deviating from expectations and creating slippage. In contrast, the advantages of rToken mainly lie in deeper trading positions and higher trading volumes. According to document data, on multiple targets such as SNDK, SpaceX, COIN, MU, NVDA, etc., the depth of rToken's disk opening is generally tens, hundreds, or even thousands of times that of bStock. In terms of 24-hour trading volume, rToken is also significantly ahead, indicating its stronger market activity and order taking ability. Taking NVDA as an example, rToken not only has a lower bid ask spread, but also has a much higher trading depth and volume than bStock. For such popular US stock targets, the stronger the liquidity, the smaller the price impact when users buy and sell, and the more stable the trading experience. For example, for targets such as MAMericapaceX, although bStock's surface price is not bad, the depth of the trading position is relatively thin, and a slightly larger amount of trading may result in slippage. And rToken has a deeper trading position, better able to handle medium to large orders, and a more stable actual transaction experience. So, the core difference between rToken and bStock can be summarized as follows: small transactions look at price differences, while large transactions look at depth. If it is only a small attempt, the difference between the two modes may not be significant; But if you really want to allocate US stock assets, especially when trading popular targets such as NVDA, COIN, and MAMericapaceX, the advantages of rToken will be even more prominent. From the user's perspective, rToken is more suitable for people with real trading needs. Its advantage is not simply reflected in its attractive pricing, but in its ability to provide deeper liquidity, lower slippage, and a more stable price experience when the order is truly executed. In addition, compared to traditional securities firms' account opening, exchange, and deposit processes, participating in US stock assets through cryptocurrency exchanges is also more in line with the usage habits of cryptocurrency users. Users can directly use stablecoins such as USDT to participate in US stock price fluctuations, with shorter operation paths and lower trading thresholds. Overall, bStock is more suitable for small-scale testing, while rToken is more suitable for medium to large value trading and popular US stock allocation needs. For users who truly care about the trading experience, the depth of the opening, trading volume, and sliding point control are the key to judging whether a product is good or not. At present, BG Exchange adopts the rToken model. If you want to experience a trading method with deeper trading positions, lower slippage points, and closer to the real US stock market, you can go to the BG exchange to actually experience it.