Why did the latecomers win against you? ——How does MarsChain use mathematics to hedge its first mover advantage There is an unspoken unspoken rule in traditional public chains: those who start on the field eat meat, while those who finish later can't even lick their bowls. In the early days, laptops could mine Bitcoin, but now without a mining farm, it's impossible to play. Ethereum is more typical - Nansen's February 2026 data shows that over 60% of ETH is locked in staking contracts, with Lido controlling 31% and the top ten addresses holding 61% of the circulation. Do you want to participate in consensus? Take 32 ETH first, ordinary people can't gather enough without eating or drinking for several years. This is the dead loop of PoS: the more staking, the greater the weight, and the greater the profit. Once the Matthew effect is activated, new users will never be able to squeeze in. MarsChain's design directly lifted up this table. Its computing power formula is: the computing power obtained by destroying tokens=the amount destroyed x the total computing power of the entire network ÷ (188 x the daily output of the entire network). Here's a counterintuitive operation - the higher the overall computing power of the entire network, the more computing power you can get for the same amount of money. For example, when the computing power of the entire network is 10000P, destroying 1000 MARS will result in 23.8P of computing power; When the computing power of the entire network reaches 20000P, even if the daily production is halved due to half-life, you can still get 47.6P by destroying the same amount. Those who enter first cannot lie down, as they will be continuously diluted by later entrants. There is also a more ingenious design: the lower the coin price, the lower the cost of destruction, and the rational choice is not to cut the meat and run, but to increase the cost. This is completely opposite to the traditional market's trend of panic selling as the market falls. There is no such thing as' once and for all 'in the system - without continuous destruction, the weight of computing power will shrink. The interests of early and late players in traditional public chains are in opposition, with the former running away when they hope to increase, while the latter comes in to take over the market. MarsChain used a dynamic computing power model to bind two groups of people together: every destruction you leave behind is itself driving up the coin price.