Patrick Hansen
Patrick Hansen|Jun 17, 2026 10:35
๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ƒ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐„๐ฎ๐ซ๐จ ๐ˆ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐„๐ฎ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ž'๐ฌ ๐€๐ง๐ฌ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐จ ๐š $300 ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐’๐ญ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ข๐ง ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ค๐ž๐ญ ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ Can a euro CBDC really fix Europe's stablecoin problem? In my new op-ed in @TheBigWhale_ , I push back on a premise that's become common in some banking and central banking circles. https://www.thebigwhale.io/article/the-digital-euro-is-not-europes-answer-to-a-300-billion-stablecoin-market The planned retail digital euro and MiCA e-money tokens are built on different rails, carry a distinct legal nature, serve different use cases, and reach different users. Treating one as a substitute for the other is a costly policy mistake we cannot afford. The policy risk is that the two instruments continue to be conflated, and Europe under-invests in its euro stablecoin ecosystem under the assumption that a euro CBDC will fill the current euro stablecoin gap. It will not.(Patrick Hansen)
+5
Mentioned
Share To

Timeline

HotFlash

APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads