Bitget, this is actually quite simple Don't use third-party clearing institutions as cover Don't confuse the public with third-party settlement entities Don't use a bunch of penetrating 'compliance rhetoric' to appease users Just answer one underlying logic: Does Bitget have an independent brokerage license under its own control? if there is The main body holding the card is exposed Share the registered regulatory jurisdiction Show the penetration number of the license plate if not Why do you provide tokenized Equities services to retail investors? The channel has a license plate It doesn't mean you have the qualifications to hold a license Others will help you with the aftermath settlement It doesn't mean you can sell securities in compliance at the front desk It's like borrowing someone else's kitchen to cook Then he publicly claimed to have a catering license Who are you fooling? MSX and BIT dare to put independent brokerage licenses on the table at least Do you have Bitget? Don't force yourself to reap the benefits of the 'regular army' without an independent license plate Don't use the word 'compliance' every day to show off and pressure people This industry requires healthy competition But there's no need to wander around the regulatory red line for arbitrage On the one hand, we still need to stand on the moral high ground and guide the country @GracyBitget CEO, come out and give a positive response Bitget without obtaining independent broker qualifications Selling stock token business to individual investors Is it compliant or not? Is it legal or not?