These days, there aren’t many exchanges that can just roll back user account transaction data and ban accounts with a single email. Appreciate it while it lasts. Honestly, I thought only small, shady, or sketchy exchanges would pull something like this. But for BG, which claims to be one of the TOP exchanges, to do this? I didn’t see that coming. In my simple understanding, doesn’t a platform lack enforcement authority? For something like this—unilaterally declaring you’re in breach of contract and rolling back transactions—even a regulated casino wouldn’t dare to do this, right? If they do, it should at least be backed by legal grounds and solid evidence proving the customer was cheating, no? I asked around a bit, and apparently, this was triggered by the ESPORTS project. I checked the K-line and noticed a guillotine drop on May 25th. Not sure if it was caused by the project team running off, a market maker manipulating liquidity, or some exchange blowing up. But regardless of the situation, shouldn’t there be a proper investigation, a public explanation, and then a resolution in accordance with laws and regulations? A platform shouldn’t just shift the cost of “its own risk control failures” or “a project team running away” onto regular traders. But thinking back to how they handled the VOXEL incident in April 2025, this kind of behavior isn’t all that surprising anymore. As for the email claiming this action complies with the platform’s “Terms of Use” that you agreed to—this is just bullying the weak. Everyone knows that most people don’t read the terms when registering for any platform; they just check the box by default. Even if they did read and agree, this is like the principle of invalidating unfair clauses in labor arbitration. Are you saying that if the “Terms of Use” included a slavery clause and users clicked agree, it would still be enforceable?