From the company's perspective, this can be explained as a "diversification of funding sources." But let's simplify the question. "If the existing structure was truly sufficient, was there really a need for new products?" Whether in business or in human relationships, once a structure becomes too complex, cracks eventually begin to appear. Take a look at Strategy's official X account. The structure has become incredibly complicated. Why did it end up this way? Was it really necessary to go this far? And why has Strategy become so heavily focused on STRC this year? Why is the company promoting STRC so aggressively, in a way that feels very different from the Strategy we used to know? I believe these are very important questions. @ForeDex_Global data preparation is now complete. Starting next week, I will be introducing a variety of datasets related to Strategy. And I suspect some of the conclusions may not be particularly positive. Every company says everything is fine—right up until the moment a problem appears. And in most cases, they will naturally present the situation in the way that is most favorable to them. What matters is not what they say. What matters is what the data is actually telling us.(mignolet)