I just saw a new tweet from BP that Michael S. Piwowar has joined the Backpack US board of directors. I don't know about this guy. To put it simply, he has been a regular member of the SEC for five years and the acting chairman of Trump's point. In 2017, when ICOs were flying everywhere and regulators in various countries pretended not to see it, he was one of the earliest high-level officials in the United States to publicly discuss how to manage digital assets. Let's start with the ugly words. I have seen too many news about "former regulatory officials joining", and the last announcement before my death was "We attach great importance to compliance" for several stray dogs who have been reset to zero in my wallet. So by default, a question mark is placed first. But this time there's something different, he's a director, not a consultant. If a consultant has an accident and leaves, the director is responsible under US law. A person who has worked in the SEC for five years and whose most valuable asset is that face cannot commit to signing their name onto a project that could explode at any moment. He dares to sign, indicating that they have done more due diligence than we can see. Combined with the fact that the president is former CFTC acting chairman Wetjen, and the newly launched US stock business BP is aiming to stay within the US regulatory framework for a long time, it is obvious. Even pouring cold water on regulatory background can prevent you from being killed, but it cannot guarantee that the product will be used by someone. Robinhood and Coinbase are both trying to put real stocks on the blockchain, but none of them have been successful. So, in one sentence, the signal is true, but it's about which path BP has chosen, not which path will definitely pass. Keep an eye on the observation list, don't get on top. What do you think, at this level, entering the board of directors carries more weight or is it a routine operation?