Polymarket airdrop players are taking things to a whole new level: Not only trading every day, but also improving their accounts from all angles— Posting bonds to challenge proposals, Staking UMA to fight for dispute voting rights, Turning 'community participation weight' into real governance. This isn’t just simple prediction anymore; this is real Skin in the Game with actual money on the line. Meanwhile, things seem much simpler over at predict: Just test various strategies to earn points, no extra hassle. But the strategies iterate so fast that as soon as one is announced, it’s already overrun. This morning, o1 had some new developments— In cases of tied scores, they suddenly introduced 'unequal rights' with a bunch of extra conditions. (While it makes sense for o1’s special circumstances, it also exposes the weakness of a pure points-based system.) Blind grinding, points, or points with conditions— which of these 3 modes do you prefer?