The US Iran agreement seems to have collapsed ❗ ️ Trump didn't give Iran a penny, but the conditions were already on the table ❗ ️ Many people think that after the war is over, the next step is negotiation, compromise, and exchange of interests. But this time, the signal released by the United States is completely different. money Not for now. Conditions? Execute first. According to public sources, the series of demands made by the United States to Iran leave little room for negotiation. Looking at these conditions together, one will find that each one is not a symbolic statement, but a hard indicator that must be implemented on the ground. Firstly, the Strait of Hormuz must resume normal navigation and be open in both directions. Global merchant ships are free to pass through without any additional barriers or any form of 'toll fees'. Secondly, safety hazards within the strait must be thoroughly eliminated. The various issues left over from the previous conflict, including waterway risks and mine threats, need to be resolved as soon as possible. A large number of international merchant ships were once trapped on this world's most important energy transportation channel, and now the top priority is to restore normal order. But what really attracts global attention is actually the nuclear issue. In past military operations, the United States has carried out large-scale strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. The signal released by the United States now is very clear: relevant nuclear capabilities must be completely restricted, and all potential risks must be strictly regulated. In other words, not only do we need to stop, but we also need to ensure that we cannot restart in the future. Even more intriguing is the issue of funding. Many people originally thought that as long as Iran cooperated to fulfill these requirements, the United States would release some economic benefits as bargaining chips. But Trump's attitude was unusually direct. Execute first. As for the funding arrangement, we will discuss it later. This sentence sounds simple, but it reveals an extremely strong negotiating stance. Because in international politics, there are often two modes of negotiation. The first mode is called exchange. You take a step back, I take a step back; You give me some, I'll give you some. Both sides sat at the table repeatedly pulling and tugging, ultimately finding a balance point. The second mode is called execution. The rules are already there, the remaining question is just how far they will be implemented. When the strength of both parties is close, negotiation emphasizes balance; When the power gap is widened, negotiations often only involve execution. This is also why many international issues may appear to be negotiating conditions on the surface, but in reality, they are competing for strength. Because every word on the conference table is never just a diplomat standing behind it. Standing behind are military strength, industrial capability, financial system, and global influence. Without these things to support it, even the most beautiful diplomatic rhetoric would be just a paper article. So many netizens exclaimed after reading it: International relations are never fairy tales. Rules are written on paper, but the person who explains them is often the one who truly holds the initiative. Many times, the bottom line is not determined by effort, but by strength; Chips are not negotiated, but exchanged for strength. This may be the most realistic aspect of international politics. However, Iran is not a pushover, nor is it a soft persimmon easily manipulated by others! I estimate that Iran will continue to negotiate with Trump while fighting! Will the US Iran agreement not be implemented until the Year of the Monkey and the Year of the Horse?