The current entry price of ASTER seems to be not good, and some interesting things can be drawn from the comparison of core data with HYPE (for reference only) At present, the ranking of contracts on the chain is HYPE first and ASTER second, but the data between the two is far apart Platform revenue -9.5 times difference The daily transaction volume of Hyperliquid is approximately $5.8 billion, corresponding to a transaction fee income of $1.9 million brought by the platform Aster's daily trading volume is $1.6 billion, with a daily revenue of $200000 (The above data is based on a comprehensive summary of the past 7 days) Repurchase mechanism Almost all (97% -100%) of Hyperliquid is used for repurchasing and burning HYPE Aster uses 70% for repurchase, but only half of the repurchased tokens are destroyed, and the other half will be used to incentivize airdrops. In reality, only 35% of the revenue is used for token destruction, with HYPE's destruction ratio being 2.7 times that of ASTER Currently, the difference in circulating market value is 6.1 times HYPE's circulating market value is 11 billion US dollars Aster's circulating market value is 1.8 billion US dollars The difference in platform revenue multiplied by the repurchase mechanism multiplied by the premium of leading projects is likely to be more than 6.1 times the difference Personal opinion: The multiple superposition here is not an addition or multiplication. Based on the overall superposition, I feel that there is more than a difference of 6.1 times. Therefore, I think that if pure data is compared without the existence of other variable factors (such as the influence of CZ in the early stage, the support of Binance, etc.), the current price of ASTER is not ideal