Anthropic's article has shown me their extreme anxiety about the development of AI in China. The entire text calls on the US government to restrict the development of AI in China. Restricting China's computing power. Restricting the distillation of Chinese AI companies. Currently, Qwen and DeepSeek have been among the top open-source companies in the world, while Xiaomi MIMO, KIMI, GLM, and ByteDance are also flourishing. In terms of model quality, China lags behind the United States by about 6 months, with a performance lag of less than 20%. However, its cost is ten times or even dozens of times cheaper than the top models in the United States. Claude's current competitor is OpenAI, but it has more potential Chinese competitors because when the performance is 10% -20% lower and the cost is ten times cheaper, which one would you choose? Chinese companies excel at occupying the mid to low end market with 70-80% performance at one-third to half the price. This has happened in industries such as electronics, mobile phones, new energy vehicles, and photovoltaics. And in the AI industry, it may also happen. The AI capital expenditure of American companies is about five times higher than that of China, but they have not achieved a sufficiently leading level. It also allows Anthropic, which is about to go public, to use lobbying to restrict the development of more competitors. Finally, regarding the user: In the future, users may face stricter KYC and API restrictions to prevent Chinese companies from distilling.