⚡ Spark's risk management aesthetics are still ongoing: SparkLend has raised the supply limit of wBTC from 3000 wBTC to 30000 wBTC, while releasing up to 500 wBTC of new capacity every 12 hours. While encouraging borrowing, it also effectively avoids sudden liquidity risks, monitors utilization and default indicators, and ensures protocol security. This is what I particularly like about Spark @ spakdotfi - it has both in and out options, and even if it needs to be expanded, risk control must be prioritized. Previously, clearing rsETH was to kick out unprofitable risks; Raising the wBTC cap now is to bring in high-quality collateral. One is to do subtraction, and the other is to do addition, but behind it is actually the same logic: only expanding the range of assets that one can understand, undertake, and monitor. Didn't you notice? Under this logic, Spark has almost silently achieved TOP: Stable large-scale liabilities; The deepest batch of stablecoin liquidity in the entire network; An increasingly strong ability to retain funds; Stable TVL/net deposits and fee income=stable funding base. If I were a whale holding a position of tens of millions of US dollars, I would definitely choose Spark. Theoretically, a 2% increase in APY would only result in an additional $1 million per year, which is far less meaningful than the words' stability 'and' safety '! Because in the future, the real value of DeFi will definitely be who has stable, cheap, and schedulable large-scale liquidity in their hands.